WTC GLORY needs specialists, no stopgaps – GAUTAM GAMBHIR must rethink its test approach | Cricket news
New Delhi: As a secular adage goes in cricket, “the strikers win you, but the quisors win tournaments.” Unfortunately, Team India’s head coach Gautam Gambhir does not believe in this theory when it comes to testing the cricket.Go beyond the border with our YouTube channel. Subscribe now!Since he resumed the role of Team India head coach, the results have been a mixed bag. In T20is, India is world champion, and taking into account the depth of talent with Jasprit Bumrah, they will dominate the world cricket for a while. The future of a day’s cricket is in a solution, but India under Gambir has won the Champions 2024 trophy, with two of the best in the format – Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli – supported by a four -component spin attack. In two years, even without these two pillars, this Indian cricket team can win the next World Cup in South Africa and put this ghost of November 19 behind them.
Gambir’s predecessor, Rahul Dravid, called the depth of the talent of the white ball of “frightening” India, and he is right because it is a well -oiled system that will produce results.We can say that the most difficult work for any coach and captain is the cricket test, the format which is probably the quintessence of sport. Test Cricket tests the character of the individuals, and you need a strategy, and above all, you need what can be made of 20 counters and win matches. Twice, India has become scary on the verge of winning the World Test Championship (WTC), only to finish second.
Survey
Kuldeep Yadav should have been included in game XI during the recent series against England?
Under Gautam Gambir, India has played 15 test games, winning five and losing eight, including an embarrassing defeat of the series at home against New Zealand, their first in 12 years. His red ball tactics raised her eyebrows; Its rigidity by prioritizing the depth of the striker on the balance, and its decision to keep Kuldeep Yadav on the bench, cost India a gold chance to bury the bazballers once and for all. India has managed to draw the series, thanks to an animated performance supported by the extraordinary competence of Mohammed Siraj, but they should have beat toy England.In the Delhi cricket circuit, there is a famous line on Gautam Gambir: “If you like you, he will go beyond to make sure you are in the XI of play, and if he does not, you will not be near the premises of the Arun Jaitley stadium.” Gambhir has had his just part of controversy since his days of play, and he is always abrasive as a coach. “You are only a man in the field,” he launched to the Surrey field, Lee Fortis, in an argument. This is the equivalent of Delhi de l’Argot like “Teri Aukaat Kya Hai? (What is your status?)”Going back to cricket, there were so many flaws in Gambir’s strategy in the Anderson-Tendulkar trophy recently concluded. On the mainly flat terraces in England, the Kuldeep Yadav wrist, which had struck England at home on similar terrain with 19 counters in four tests, wore drinks. The reason given was that the management wanted a depth of striker. There were three Indians in the five main runners in the series; Harry Brook succeeded in Pip Rishabh Pant by two points while the Indian Window has missed the oval test due to an injury.
Kuldeep Yadav (Getty Images)
Is Kuldeep completely a failure with the bat?No, Gambir coach, it is not. He is not flashy, but he knows how to put a price on his counter. Do you remember his vigil of 131 Ranchi balls, where he scored 28 and forged a 76 -point stand for the eighth window with the Dhruv Jurel? India finally won the match. In Dharamsala again, he marked a precious 30. A few years ago, on a chattogram field in dice, he faced 114 balls for his 40th anniversary, and his full display earned him the match player.Forget Kuldeep, what was the point of sending Akash Deep as night guard at Lord’s when you had a dough on the lower order accomplished with Washington Sundar, fresh out of his beautiful spell? India could have used the vigorous blows of Akash Deep when Ravi will Jadeja tried to cultivate the strike in the fourth round.ASHUL KAMBOJ was called upon to replace injuries for Arshdeep Singh and was made his test in testing at Old Trafford, probably the most flattened terrain in the series. He looked at the whole sea, and the reasoning was that they wanted it for the conditions covered. The most appropriate place for Anshul or even Arshdeep in Bowl was on the spicy field, but they wore drinks.The n ° 3 of India has been reduced to a set of musical chairs. Sai Sudharsan played the first test but was abandoned in Edgbaston. Karun Nair, who was appointed n ° 6 of India in Headingley, had the opportunity and played the following two tests, but was then abandoned to Old Trafford. The reasoning of the Gambir coach was that no one by his side fell, they just look for a good balance. Karun made a return to the oval because the pants were released and India was trying to strengthen the striker, and Washington Sundar, who had marked a century winning at No. 6 In the fourth test, struck in n ° 8.Yes, India has managed to steal a series draw against England, but they should have won it, and coach Gambir must think about his philosophy in the future.
