We like to think that we are direct with information: that we want answers when they are useful and that we avoid them when they are not. In reality, our relationship with knowledge is much more complicated, shaped as much by emotion as by reason.
Published in Current opinion in psychologyNew findings challenge the common view that information avoidance – often described as “willful ignorance” – is primarily about avoiding responsibility. Instead, research suggests that avoiding information and seeking painful facts arise from the same emotional process.
According to researchers, people manage information by weighing two competing discomforts: the stress of uncertainty and the emotional impact of knowing. What seems easiest to bear in the moment often determines whether people turn toward the information or turn away from it.
“Our decisions about information – whether to confront it or avoid it – are not only functional but often emotional. We constantly oscillate between the desire to know and the instinct to protect ourselves from information, weighing which will hurt less: the painful truth or uncertainty,” the researchers said in a press release.
How people decide when to know – and when to look away
To explain why people sometimes avoid information and other times actively seek it, researchers propose a simple decision model focused on emotional tolerance. At any given moment, people seem to weigh two internal limits: how much uncertainty they can bear and how much emotional impact they can bear by knowing the truth.
When uncertainty becomes emotionally taxing, people are more likely to seek information, even if that information is painful or cannot change the outcome. In contrast, when the anticipated emotional weight of knowledge seems more difficult to bear, people tend to delay or avoid learning it, even when the information might be useful. In both cases, the behavior serves the same purpose: to regulate emotional tension by choosing the form of discomfort that seems most manageable in the moment.
The model also helps explain why information behavior can change so quickly depending on context. The same person may avoid information in one situation and seek it in another, not because their values or goals have changed, but because their emotional capacity has changed. Factors such as stress, timing, and perceived stakes can tip the scales toward uncertainty or toward the truth.
Seen in this light, avoidance and information seeking are not opposing tendencies or signs of inconsistency. They are flexible responses generated by the same emotional mechanism – a mechanism that continually balances the fear of knowing and the discomfort of not knowing.
Learn more: Smiling during the holidays can instantly change the way people perceive you
Two psychological tools for living with uncertainty
The findings suggest that our relationship to information is driven less by curiosity or avoidance alone than by emotional self-management. The desire to know and the desire not to know are not opposing forces, researchers say, but two psychological tools that people use to cope with threatening or overwhelming situations.
This perspective has practical implications. In contexts such as health care, public communication, and institutional decision-making, how and when information is conveyed can be as important as what is shared. Access to facts alone does not determine how people respond; emotional preparation plays an essential role.
In an age where information is almost always at our fingertips, the study serves as a reminder that knowledge is not just something we accumulate. It’s something we actively choose, weighing which discomfort feels more bearable in the moment: facing the truth or living in uncertainty.
Learn more: The Gaslighters resume the learning process, forcing their targets to question themselves
Article sources
Our Discovermagazine.com editors use peer-reviewed research and high-quality sources for our articles, and our editors review the articles for scientific accuracy and editorial standards. See the sources used below for this article:
