Why the case of the murders of the Yogurt store remains unresolved

It has been 33 years since four girls have been fatally shot in the head, I cannot believe that it is yogurt! In Austin, Texas, December 6, 1991: Amy Ayers (13), Jennifer Harbison (17), Sarah Harbison (15) and Eliza Thomas (17).

And 33 years later, why these girls were targeted is still a mystery. The case is the subject of a new documentary series in four HBO parts The murder yogurt shop, which was broadcast every week on Sunday evening between August 3 and August 24. The series explores the main theories on which the girls murdered and gives families the victims of the space to remember their loved ones. The series contains rare images following suspects while they were preparing for the trial, filmed by a local documentary filmmaker from Austin Claire Huie.

Although the series does not contain new revelations, it gives a complete overview of the case. Here’s how the final concludes its coverage of a complicated story.

Where the case of yogurt murder is now

The murders of the yogurt store Focus on the main suspects of the case, a group of teenagers who dragged together the night of the murder and had access to a firearm: Maurice Pierce, Michael Scott, Robert Springsteen and Forrest Welborn. Pierce has always argued that Welborn had borrowed his weapon and told him that he had killed the girls, while Welborn said he was only joking when he said that.

There has never been any evidence to accuse Pierce and Welborn, but Springsteen and Scott were found guilty of murdering girls in 2001 and 2002, respectively. They admitted to having murdered the girls, but said that the confessions were under duress, and they were looking for a way to get out of the stressful interrogation. Springsteen was sentenced to the death penalty, while Scott was sentenced to life prison.

Between 2006 and 2007, the Texas Criminal Court of Appeal canceled their convictions, determining that Scott and Springsteen did not have the opportunity to contravene it, according to their rights to the 6th amendment. There was supposed to have a new trial, but DNA tests carried out on remaining evidence of the victims were carried out again using more recent technology, and none of the DNA designed Pierce, Scott, Springsteen or Welborn. Whether there was a contamination or another person involved in crime was not clear. In 2009, the accusation rejected the accusations against Scott and Springsteen.

Since there was no physical evidence to connect these four boys to the crime scene, the case is not resolved. The final does not end with a verdict on whom the girls murdered, leaving the viewers to draw their own conclusions.

How the families of the victims face sorrow

Eliza Thomas’ sister, Sonora, is now a therapist, a job to whom she was attracted because she wanted to help other people to cure sorrow as she did.

Barbara Ayres-Wilson, Jennifer’s mother and Sarah, describes the mourning process as a roller coaster, explaining: “We are so close to pain, it’s more comfortable to be there than to go to love.” The final ends with Sonora and Barbara holding hands. “I hope it helps someone,” adds Barbara.

The final ends with Sonora explaining how cathartic it can be to share memories of dear beings, arguing: “There is a real advantage for the storyteller and the public member to tell this story, to hear this story. I think that can change the way a memory lives in you. ”

Even if what these families have experienced is so unique, director Margaret Brown considers the series as “an exploration of the way people deal with trauma and the way people manage sorrow”. She hopes that the resilience of families will inspire viewers who could face sorrow.