The republicans of the house move to put their cachet on DC while the fixed budget languid

Three months ago, President Trump urged the Republicans to the House to “immediately” correct a budgetary hole of $ 1.1 billion that they forced to Washington, DC this week, the legislators rather advanced bills to impose their political program on the government led by the Democrats of the City – without dealing with the lack of funding.

The Chamber adopted two bills on Tuesday to cancel the local legislation adopted by the government of the district: one to repeal a law allowing non-citizens to vote in the local elections and another of the suppressed provisions which facilitate the discipline of the police for fault.

A third bill, planned for a vote later this week, would prevent the district from adopting laws on the sanctuary and would oblige local officials to cooperate with federal immigration policies.

While they moved to shape the laws of the district, the House Republicans took no measure to approach the budgetary hole they created when they adopted a bill on Stopgap spending in March. Several legislators suggested Tuesday that a resolution remained distant and potentially even outside the table, despite the declared support of Mr. Trump.

“No one is talking about it anymore,” said Maryland’s Andy Harris representative, president of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus. “No one talks about it at all.”

President Mike Johnson blamed the delay in the need to combat other republican priorities. “We have a lot on our plate,” he said on Tuesday.

The three bills linked to the district should still be approved by the Senate, where seven Democrats should join all the Republicans to allow the measures to be taken into account for a vote.

Since the Republicans took control of the Chamber two years ago, they have increasingly eager to exercise the powers of the Congress to block the legislation adopted by the district officials. Last year, the Chamber adopted a ban similar to the voting of non-citizens, but it blocked the Senate led by Democrats.

Under the 1973 law which gave power to the residents of the district to elect a mayor and a council, the congress kept the power to review the legislation of the district. The approximately 700,000 inhabitants of the district have no vote in the congress but are represented by a non -vot delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton, who can sit in chamber committees but cannot vote on bills.

On the floor of the House, Ms. Norton, a democrat, condemned the legislation of the chamber as “anti-democratic”, claiming that the bills have reversed the rights of local residents to govern themselves.

“It is always false and never the right time for the congress to legislate on local DC issues,” said Norton. But the bills were even more blatant, she added, given the failure of the end of the budgetary gap, which it called “tax sabotage” by the Republicans.

When the Republicans adopted a bill in March to maintain the funded federal government, they did not include a routine language which exempts the budget of the expenditure limits. Without this, the district was forced to return to last year’s financing levels, even if the money it spends comes from the local taxes it has already collected.

The Senate has massively approved separate legislation to rectify the issue. Mr. Trump – Who practically sounded the mayor in his declared ambitions to clean the streets of the district and “embellish” his parks – threw his approval behind the measure. But the house has never taken the solution.

When nothing had happened by April, Mayor Muriel Bowser alerted the congress by virtue of a 2009 federal law, it had the power to increase local credits by 6%, which reduces the deficit by $ $ 410 million. This is always equivalent to a substantial reduction in what the district had budgeted.

Ms. Bowser’s office said in a statement that she “continued to oppose any interference of the congress in the lives and business of the Washingtonian” and urged the room to pass funding and “repair their damage” to the district budget.

Some Republicans agree that the district must have autonomy on the income it perceives.

“I maintain that DC spends his own money,” said Kentucky James Comer representative on Monday, president of the supervisory committee, who oversees the district laws and budget during a bill. “This has nothing to do with the legislation we present today.”

But other Republicans argued that their support for the expenditure correction was subject to their taxation on their point of view, abortion and other questions.

The representative Steve Scalie de Louisiana, the Republican No. 2, suggested that the problems should still be resolved before the budgetary measure could be adopted.

“We are working on it right now,” he said on Tuesday. “But obviously, there are other problems that we are trying to solve along the way.”