The conservatives have undertaken to remove the historical climate change legislation of the United Kingdom and to replace it with a “cheap and reliable” energy strategy.
The climate Change Act 2008, which has put objectives to repress emissions, was introduced by the last Labor government and strengthened under the conservative PM Theresa May.
Conservative chief Kemi Badenoch said that his party wanted to leave “a cleaner environment for our children”, but argued that “labor laws have linked us to paperwork, have charged us with cost and did nothing to reduce global emissions”.
Environmental groups have said that this decision would be an act of “national autumutilation”, while the Labor Party said it would be “an economic disaster and total betrayal of future generations”.
The conservative minister of the former primary, the Baroness Theresa May, criticized the decision of “retrograde stage which upsets 17 years of consensus between our main political parties and the scientific community”.
“Roging now would be a catastrophic error while this consensus is tested, science remains the same,” added Baroness.
The 2008 law, which was adopted when the current energy secretary Ed Miliband was in the same role in the government of Gordon Brown, committed the United Kingdom to reduce carbon emissions by 80% by 2050.
In 2019, under the post of Prime Minister of May, this legally binding target was updated to reach Net Zero by 2050 – which means that the United Kingdom must reduce carbon emissions until it eliminates as much as it produces.
The legislation has also created the Climate Change Committee, which advises the government to achieve the objective and reports on progress towards the reduction of emissions.
At the time, the law was adopted by Parliament with the support of all the major parties.
However, the political consensus on Net Zero has since fragmented.
Badenoch previously said that Net Zero’s objective by 2050 was “impossible” for the United Kingdom to meet and promises to “maximize” the extraction of northern oil and gas.
Reform UK also said that it would close the zero net objectives if he won the next elections, blaming the higher energy bill policy and deindustrialisation in the United Kingdom.
The United Kingdom was the first country to establish a legally binding framework in the long term to reduce carbon emissions, and since the law has been adopted, many other countries have introduced similar legislation.
However, the conservatives said that the law had forced ministers “to make decisions to achieve arbitrary climatic objectives, even if they make the British poorer, destroy jobs and strengthen our economy.”
The party argues that the 2008 law “forced successive governments to introduce punitive measures that have reached family finances”.
For example, he highlighted the fines for boilers manufacturers who do not reach the objectives of heat pump sales, that the criticisms have marked a “boiler tax”.
The program, announced but then delayed by the previous conservative government, entered into force under work in April.
The United Kingdom has high electricity costs, classifying the fourth higher for national consumers of average use compared to other EU countries, and the highest for industrial use.
The Labor Party affirms that its plan to stimulate clean energy in Great Britain will reduce the energy bills of households from “up to £ 300 by 2030. However, earlier this year, energy bills increased by 6% for a typical family.
Badenoch said: “We want to leave a specific environment for our children, but not by bankrupt the country.
“Climate change is real. But the laws of labor have linked us to administrative formalities, have charged us with costs and did nothing to reduce global emissions. The previous conservative governments have tried to operate the climatic work laws – they do not.
“Under my direction, we will remove these failed objectives. Our priority is now the growth, cheaper energy and the protection of natural landscapes that we all love.”
However, Miliband said: “This desperate policy of Kemi Badenoch, if ever implemented, would be an economic disaster and total betrayal of future generations.
“The Conservatives would now eliminate a framework for which companies have campaigned in the first place and have provided dozens of billions of local British energy investment books since its adoption by a Labor government with conservative support 17 years ago.”
Former conservative minister Lord Alok Sharma, who was president of COP 26 A Climate Summit in 2021, said the last conservative government had a heritage of “world leadership” on the fight against climate change and exhorted Badenoch not to “slip this for the good of the short -term political opportunity”.
The Liberals Democrats also criticized the announcement.
Party energy security spokesperson and Net Zero, Pippa Heylings, said: “Reality is that investment in renewable energies is the greatest opportunity for economic growth of this century and will protect the planet for future generations.”
Meanwhile, Richard Benwell, Managing Director of the Wildlife and Countryside Link Coalition of Environment Group, said: “The real way to sustainable security is clean local power, without burning more fossil combustibles.
“Without binding climate law, ministers will be free to exchange our future – and it is nature and the poorest communities that will pay the price.”
