Nuclear merger will soon feed the world

Do not worry too much about the planet’s warm -up emissions, the American Energy Secretary at the BBC said, because in the five years, the AI ​​will have allowed the nuclear fusion harness – the energy that feeds the sun and the stars.

Chris Wright told me in an interview that he expected that technology provides energy to electricity networks in the world in eight to 15 years and that it would quickly become a large engine of greenhouse gas reductions.

His claims will probably even surprise enthusiasts for technology.

Useing the energy released when the atoms merge could produce large quantities of low carbon energy, but most scientists think that central commercial merger are still far away.

“With artificial intelligence and what happens in national laboratories and private companies in the United States, we will have this approach on how to exploit several ways of merger Energy in the next five years,” said Wright.

“Technology will be on the electricity network, you know, in eight to 15 years.”

Scientists believe that nuclear merger, that Mr. Wright studied at university, could one day produce large amounts of energy without warming our atmosphere.

But it is a very complex process. Reproducing it on earth is to heat atoms at temperatures several times warmer than the sun.

President Donald Trump’s controversial energy chief also urged the British government to raise the de facto prohibition on hydraulic fracturing and to issue new petroleum and gas licenses in the North Sea.

The United States Secretary of Energy warned that the Trump administration had “serious concerns” concerning Europe’s dependence on Chinese renewable technologies.

“It seems that the Chinese could control what is going on with your energy system,” he said.

He repeated the assertions made by Donald Trump that the efforts of the United Kingdom and Europe to pass fossil fuels to a low carbon energy leads to the deindustrialization and impoverishment of their citizens.

Wright is in Brussels before Donald Trump’s second state visit to the United Kingdom next week. The American president will meet Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and attend a banquet organized by King Charles at the castle of Windsor.

During the BBC maintenance, the United States Secretary of Energy said that hydraulic fracturing – releases rocky formations trapped in oil and underground gas – could have a “huge” impact on the British economy.

Mr. Wright, who founded and managed hydraulic fracturing companies in the United States, suggested that the oil and gas that the process would produce could “bring back the manufacturing and blue-collar work and lower not only the prices of electricity, but the prices of heat and industrial energy”.

Reform UK recently said that this would encourage hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom if it were to win the next elections, but the British Geological Survey warned the potential of technology to produce large quantities of oil and gas in the United Kingdom is probably limited.

Wright defended billions of dollars in the Trump administration to renewable energies. He said wind energy has been subsidized for 33 years and that solar energy for 25 years.

“Isn’t that enough?” The energy secretary asked: “You must be able to walk alone after 25 to 30 years of grants.”

The energy secretary also exceeded the report published by the Ministry of Energy in July which said that the threat of climate change had been exaggerated.

Among a series of controversial claims, the report indicates that elevation of sea level does not accelerate, that the computer models of the climate exert the future temperature and that climatologists neglect the beneficial aspects of climate change as the fact that the high densities of carbon dioxide promote plant growth.

Earlier this month, more than 85 international scientists said it was riddled with errors and false statements and that the data had been “selected” – selectively selected. Scientists have also questioned the academic standards of the five authors of the article.

Wright told the BBC that he thought that climatologists selectively use the data. “Cherry selection data in climate science in the media, by activists and politicians are the norm,” he said.

He recognized that climate change is a “very real physical phenomenon” and said that he believed that the world would decarbonize: “These are only generations from now on, not two or three decades from now on.”

He said he was delighted that his report caused such a vigorous debate: “We have a dialogue in both directions on climate change in a public forum. I wanted it for 20 years.”

He denied that cuts by the Trump administration made climate science, including a proposal to reduce the funding of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the United States, would damage American research on weather conditions and the climate.

There have been speculations that the cuts could block the development of the next generation of meteorological satellites and could even lead to the closure of the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii, which is responsible for the longest record for direct measures of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere.

“There are many rumors about all kinds of terrible things that happen,” said Wright, who said the United States government was trying to restore “real science”.

He said: “One of the problems of science is that he has become so politicized in the world of climate, if you find yourself from the church, your funding is cut.”