Dei of the dodgers targeted by the legal group of Stephen Miller after the dead end of the ice
The main federal regulator of workplace discrimination could then target the Los Angeles Dodgers.
America First Legal, a conservative attire founded by the deputy chief of staff of the White House, Stephen Miller, filed a complaint in civil rights with the Employment Committee on the Equality of Dodgers and the Owner Controlling Mark Walter’s Guggenheim Partners. He alleys illegal discrimination under the aegis of their diversity, their equity and inclusion policies.
“The partners of Los Angeles and the partners of Guggenheim admit that race, color, sex and national origin play a motivation factor in their considerations for employment decisions,” said the complaint, filed on Monday. “However, these considerations, which the two entities admit are anchored in their culture and their daily operations, are clearly illegal.”
This decision comes shortly after the federal immigration agents in white vans and unmarked SUVs were denied entry on June 19 in the Dodgers stadium. Under Trump, the EEOC has been made in efforts to seek reprisals and extract entities concessions, namely law firms, the government considers it having been hostile to its priorities.
America First Legal was an essential cog in Trump’s repression against Dei. He targeted hiring quotas allegedly discriminatory in Disney, in particular a provision requiring that at least half of the producer and writing staff come from under-represented groups, and represented Brian Beneker, script coordinator for Seal teamIn a trial claiming that CBS studios discriminate against right white men.
In the complaint, the group alleges that the Dodgers engage in hiring, training and discriminatory recruitment practices. These include diversity pipeline initiatives and sponsorship programs designed for women and minorities.
“Despite the arguments of defenders of discrimination that – to achieve the objectives of” diversity “and” equity ” – groups, such as right white men, must be treated differently from various individuals by holding them to a higher standard of evidence, the Supreme Court has directly rejected this post,” said the file.
In particular, the Dodgers qualify on their website that they consider all candidates without regard to the characteristics protected by federal laws on civil rights. Conservative groups have argued that such a bridge language does not protect the responsibility for discrimination. The complaint does not cite policies that explicitly refer to preferences according to race, religion, age or sexual orientation.
Also in question: groups led by workers within the company aimed at promoting Dei. Although they are open so that anyone can join, they benefit certain employees according to their race, their sex or their national origin, depending on the trial.
One is the Black Action Network, which says “Foster[s] The growth, development and well-being of the black community of Dodger “in a way that” will ultimately lead to opportunities for blacks on the ground, in the stands and in the front office “; Another is Somos la, which will offer Latin employees benefits of employment; The third is the network of opportunities for women, which indicates that it provides a “equitable space for women. »»
These programs offer unique benefits to certain groups, according to the trial.
The owner of the Dodgers control is Walter, director general of the Global Investment Giant Guggenheim Partners. America claims the first legal affirmations that the company’s hiring decisions are also motivated by illegal diversity. An example: Guggenheim Partners declares that his commitment to DEI implies the development of “diversity recruitment strategies and talent management to identify, attract, develop and keep the best talents” to achieve its diversity objectives, according to complaint.
America first urged the EEOC to identify to what extent the partners Dodgers and Guggenheim discriminate the white white men by collecting application data and internal human resources policies which could identify if there is a preference for certain groups.
“The AFL has once again intensified on the plate, defending the Americans against large companies committed to discriminating according to the race, the color, the national and of sex origin,” said the first legal lawyer in America Will Scoinos. “The AFL will remain firm, taking the fight for influential societies until their policies reflect that there is no” good “discrimination, even if they use the most friendly” inclusion “terminology”.
The Dodgers did not immediately respond to a request for comments.
