The first “Final Destination Bloodlines” project featured this inherited character [Exclusive]

There is a lot to love in a horror frankness that only turns. But beyond seeing the blood and the guts of new victims meeting a slasher blade, there are characters inherited like those played by Neve Campbell And Courteney Cox In Shout Or Jennifer Love Hewitt And Freddie Prinze Jr. In I know what you did last summer. Many could consider these familiar faces as the beating heart of films, but there is a series of genres that not only need it, but their absence is in a way all that is.

Final destination This is everything that happens when someone escapes death, thus triggering the Campy, fun and explosive events that follow. At the end of each film, all the loose ends are linked – and thereby, we mean that everyone is crazy. Either that or, like Alex Browning by Devon SawaTheir off -screen disappearance is explained by the members of the distribution (but We will not believe that he left before we saw a body))! That is to say, with the exception of the case of Final destination 2‘S Kimberly Corman. Played by AJ CookThe character paid his debt to Grim Reaper by dying and being brought back to life, thus removing his name from the list – for now. We haven’t seen the character since, but his name was never on the table for Final destination Bloodlines?

Recently, sit down to chat with co -directors Zach Lipovsky and Adam SteinCollider’s Perri Nemiroff Asked the question on all our minds. And she was a good thing she did, because Lipovsky was happy to share. “There are some,” he said about a version in which Kimberly was deposited in history, “in fact, I think the very first draft we have read, she entered. [Tony Todd’s William Bludworth] said: “And here is!” “The scene in question would have seen Kimberly enter the room into the morgue of the hospital where the members of the family condemned Campbell gathered to seek the help of William Bludworth. So what happened?

While Stein admitted having thought: “It would be great to have it!” “, He said that their feelings quickly changed when they achieved the implications of his presence. “In the end, we could not overcome the fact that it was right, like, waiting there in the closet or something to arise.” And, although the Fandom would have loved having the franchise inherited character Back in the game, if it was in this scene and in this way, it would certainly have pushed the limits of the suspension of disbelief a little too far – even for Final destination.

Adam Stein and Zach Lipovsky remain satisfied with their decision for “Final Destination Bloodlines”

The pair agrees to say that keeping the character of Cook was the right choice for their Final destination movie. The film is easily his own thing and has a History heavy enough on the family That they didn’t need to throw a character from yesteryear just because they could. Explaining their reflection process, Lipovsky said:

“Then, the more we also think about it, it’s really more a film about him and his connection. This was not necessary. Some people have disclosed online that she was on the set – it never happened. I don’t even know if she was even contacted. It was just that the very The first draft was like, it exists in the world, should we bring it back? And we were like, “no” “

However, this does not mean that Kimberly will not appear on the whole line. With success that Final destination Bloodlines appreciated At the box office and beyond, there is a good chance that a seventh film can appear in the future. And with this question surrounding the future of the character of Cook, said Stein, “Well, you never know. Future films.”

Final destination Lineage Now play in cinemas. Look at our full cat with Stein and Lipovsky below.