Brand of technology nothing was surprised passing images of inventory of professional photographers such as samples taken by the phone 3. Five examples of images that nothing was captured by the device were photos under license taken with other cameras.
The photographer behind one of the images confirmed anonymously The penis that it was not taken using the phone 3, and that nothing had bought the image license via the photo image market. The penis saw the exif file for the image of the anonymous photographer and can confirm that it was not captured using the phone 3. According to exif data, it was taken in 2023, well before the publication of the phone 3 this year.
Roman Fox, another photographer who captured the car lighthouse, also confirmed to Android authority That nothing had paid for his image, which was taken in 2023 using a Fujifilm XH2S camera. No demonstration samples were accompanied by the message: “Judge for yourself. Here is what our community has captured with the phone 3. ”
In a press release published on X, just the co-founder Akis Evangelidis says that the stock images presented on live demonstration units were reserved spaces that should have been updated. Nothing actively “rectifies” the situation, according to Evangelidis, describing Fakery as “unhappy surveillance” with “no bad intention”.
“An initial version of the LDU [live demo unit] Must be submitted with spaces reserved about 4 months before the launch, to be implemented and tested while we are progressing towards mass production, “said Evangelidis.” Once we enter the mass production, these reserved space images are replaced by photo samples via a new version of the LDU, as well as renderings and videos of final products. In this case, it was brought to our attention that the original images of certain live demonstration units have not been updated. »»
The license of photos which were never intended for public use is a bit perplexed, especially since the previous process of nothing involved using photos that have been taken using the older phones of the company. This is not the first time that a phone company has been taken using false examples of photography, but one might think that nothing would learn from these errors.
