TThe federal government is launching its first in -depth examination of infant preparation nutrients in almost 30 years. Although the move can trigger questions among families, pediatric experts say that there is nothing concerns: the infantile formula approved by the FDA remains one of the most rigorously regulated food products in the country and is perfectly safe.
However, the United States Ministry of Health and Social Services (HHS) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) say it is time for a new look. On Tuesday, agencies announced that they had published a request for information on nutrients for infants.
The examination is part of an initiative launched in March, called Operation Stork Speed, which is intended to “guarantee the safety, reliability and nutritional adequacy of infants for American families”, according to HHS. It is not yet clear that will direct the exam, but the FDA should summon a panel of experts in June which will be accessible to the public.
“Operation Stork Speed brings radical transparency to the ingredients in infant preparations and puts science at the center and the center,” said HHS secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in the press release. “Each child has a fundamental right at a healthy start. We give parents the truth and the tools to get there. ”
Find out more: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says that the Americans should not take medical advice from him
Could the infant change?
Experts say that any effort to ensure that infants preparing the best nutrients is important, but they warn that this review is not a sign that the infantile formula is dangerous, and does not expect it to trigger dramatic changes.
According to HHS, the FDA “regularly examines the requirements for individual nutrients for infant preparations”, but the last time the agency carried out an in -depth examination of infants in 1998. Dr. Steven Abrams, a pediatric teacher at the University of Texas in Austin Dell School, said a complete analysis, as there was a new development in science and orientations, has an “extension” because there has been a new development in science and orientations, because 1998. The June meeting with the FDA, says it is essential that research is carried out slowly, cautiously and rigorously. He says that experts, including himself, want to “make sure that [the review] Does not become motivated by the concerns that infants’ preparation, as it currently exists, is intrinsically dangerous. This is not true.
Dr. Mark Corkins, professor of pediatrics at the University of Tennessee Health Science, says that it is possible that the journal can lead to recommendations for a little more nutrients, such as vitamin D, and a little fewer ingredients, such as iron, but: “I do not think there are changes of enormous and resulting from it.”
Learn more:: The Power RFK Jr. would have on food
What should parents know?
Experts reassure families that they should not be confused with regard to the safety of infantile formulas approved by the FDA, which is a safe alternative to breastfeeding.
Abrams warns families not to try to make their own formula or use other nutritionally inadequate and potentially dangerous alternatives, such as non -pasteurized milk or goat milk.
“I would be devastated if a parent saw this request for information, then I felt nervous about a formula for infants they use with their baby,” explains Bridget Young, an associate professor of pediatrics at the medical center of the University of Rochester. “My plea for parents would be to breathe deeply. They are safe; You don’t have to worry about the safety of our current products. ”
