Health News

Prudent defense of the humana of the Medicare program advantage

This audio is generated automatically. Please let us know if you have comments.

Humana is the second largest medicare insurer in the country. But during the annual day of the company’s investors on Monday, Humana was defender No. 1 of the program.

During the four -hour event, Humana exercised a noisy defense of private medication plans, which are popular among the elderly, but face increasing calls for reform in the midst of evidence that the main insurers play the program to bend down.

It is misunderstood, Humana ‘leaders said. Its very unloved payment structure encourages insurers to better coordinate care, leading to better results. This saves money for the elderly and taxpayers, they said.

MA, in which the Government contracts private payers to manage care for Medicare’s elders, grew up to cover more than half of all members of the federal insurance regime. Historically, he appreciated large bipartisan support.

But the prospects for the privatized alternative of health insurance have embellished in recent years, as part of the growing attention of bad behavior in MA while the Republicans in Washington are looking to brake waste, fraud and abuse in federal programs.

However, MA is essentially untouchable because of its support for reliable senior voters, according to humana leaders.

And the concerns about the controversial practices of payers intended to prevent the selection of cherries from healthier members, the diagnostics of capture earlier and the control costs are exaggerated, explained the CEO of Humana, Jim Rechtin – however, it has allowed there to be ways to improve.

“Risk adjustment and home assessments and previous authorizations have become dirty words. And they should not be dirty words,” said Rechtin. “These are excellent clinical tools. And we will defend them all day … but we have to do it responsible.”

Protect the status quo – mainly

Humana, which covers 6 million members in MA, is important financial incentive to protect the program against major changes. Privatized Medicare Plans represented $ 24.1 billion in its $ 27.8 billion in total premiums last year.

But the insurer struggled to maintain the benefits in the midst of opposite winds in the program, including higher medical costs and unfavorable regulatory updates that rerived the reimbursement.

And the actions of the main payers of MA were down in the midst of a series of recent research and media reports that draw attention to the commercial practices of insurers who, according to criticism, delay excessively or refuse care to members and inflate the government’s payments by billions of dollars each year.

For example, the CMS will pay the insurers of my 84 billion dollars more this year than if these members had been in a traditional medication, according to the influential advisory group of the Medpac Congress. Many of these overpayers have been motivated by the UP coding, in which my payers’ game diagnostic codes to exaggerate the health needs of their members – seizing higher government payments along the way.

Home assessments, in which payers send me a nurse or another clinician to visit a patient at their home, are a problematic area. These visits generate billions of inflated income for my payers by allowing them to grasp more diagnoses, according to a survey by the Wall Street Journal on Medicare Advantage Practices.

Insurers say that home checks help them treat the elderly in a more practical and comfortable setting and identify all additional needs that could go unnoticed during a visit to the doctor.

“”We have talked a lot about these annual well-being visits may not be a good thing. This is not true. Our annual well-being visits, home visits are loved by our seniors, “said George Renaudin, Humana insurance president.

But eArmy this month, the WSJ reported that Humana supports new limits to the diagnostic payments recorded by nurses in home visits which are not supported by other patient files.

“What we are not going to invest dollars is to continue the diagnostic codes that do not lead the system to a better place,” said Rechtin.

Likewise, although the prior authorization is necessary to ensure that providers only give up to date and most relevant clinical care, “we know that the prior authorization process creates friction,” said Renaudin.

Renaudin said Humana “worked hard” to reduce this friction by removing codes that do not require Humana green lamp and the automation of previous authorization determinations.

Despite a full -courted press of insurers to prevent a significant reform, Washington regulators and legislators took note of the concerns about MA.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button