Breaking News

“ No first absolute amendment to say anything ”

  • Play

    “ No first absolute amendment to say anything ”

    01:03

  • The next

    Shapiro: “Call political violence”

    01:29

  • Monarez: RFK Jr. accused the CDC of “killing children”

    00:37

  • Monarrez says RFK Jr. wanted to modify the vaccine calendar

    00:38

  • She says RFK Jr. ordered her not to speak in Congress

    00:58

  • Man just avoids being speeded

    00:25

  • Cassidy wonders why Tide has changed on the CDC director

    01:42

  • The former CDC director testifies why she was dismissed

    00:33

  • The former CDC director testifies to weeks after her dismissal

    01:01

  • The brothers and sisters of Gaza City return the rubble of their house

    01:23

  • The co-founder of Ben & Jerry resigns on the parent company

    00:36

  • President Trump arrives at Windsor Castle

    00:29

  • Images of Trump and Epstein projected on the castle of Windsor

    00:21

  • Suspect arrested in the flight of new Beyoncé music

    00:21

  • Tesla’s autonomous mode can fight near the railways

    01:27

  • Parents testify to the impact of IA chatbots

    01:22

  • Trump extends the Tiktok deadline by avoiding banning

    00:23

  • Florida deputies save a couple who crashed in Swamp

    00:52

  • The judge denies the request of Menendez Brothers for a new trial

    00:58

  • Trump says he would have lowered the flags for Minn. Legislative

    00:41

The first amendment does not protect employees who have been disciplined or licensed for their online reactions to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. NBC News legal analyst Danny Cevallos, explains why.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button