Michael B. Jordan and Denzel Washington are right – we have to bring back the mystical film star

Of his double performance acclaimed by criticism in Sinners to his red carpet kisses with Tom Cruise At Mission: Impossible – The last calculation first, Michael B. JordanThe 2025 was the dream year of a film star so far. The success of Sinners specifically did a lot not only for Jordan’s career, but for industry as a whole, like her Helped show Hollywood that the original tales built around charismatic stars can always draw in the large box office numbers– Still in the era of superheroes, suites and restarts. Given the nauseous number of conversations that have been presented by the initiates of industry and regular moviegoers in recent years to find out if movie stars are still there, it was a great victory.

Even in period of triumph, however, Jordan is careful to avoid overexposure and to preserve his public image. In a recent interview with Vulture, the Creed Star said he actively chooses not to publish on social networks Or talk too much about the press of his personal life with the express goal of “creating a request”. It is a strategy that has been at least partially informed by the wisdom of one of the great cinema stars of all time, Denzel Washington. According to Jordan, Washington advised him one day: “Why would they pay to see you a weekend if they see you all week for free?” This is a question that any actor in list A should probably ask themselves at some point in their career. But this is particularly crucial now, at a time when The national obsession of the public for fame threatens the ability of cinema to attract the public to the theater.

The obsession of celebrities attenuated the power and the relevance of the stars of cinema formerly possessed

Although it may seem contradictory to say that the film Stardom dies at the same time as the collective interest of our society for the celebrities has never been greater – thank you for the underectly filtered access granted by social media and an entertainment coverage 24/7 –Both things are actually directly connected. The Internet era consumed by the celebrities in which we are currently living in a need for fans to present themselves in a cinema in order to see their favorite stars. For children in the 90s who were obsessed with Leonardo DiCAPRI,, It was logical to pay to go see Titanic Five times in the theater Because they did not have access to so much content related to the Leo in their daily life. Of course, they may have taken an appearance of a talk show or an interview on the red carpet on a television of awards, but that was almost everything. And, with the Internet, obviously, not being what it is now, it was things that they could really see only once live, or not at all.

Related

The 10 most emblematic film stars of the 1950s, classified

“I am selfish, impatient and a little unsure …”

When you advance quickly today, young crazy people of celebrities can spend countless hours online to do the content centered on their favorite stars. Without forgetting that streaming services and VOD platforms allow us to easily start a show or film with our favorite actor when we want. Spending money to see someone’s work on the big screen is More the main way that fans interact with their favorite cinema stars. There is less emergency for some people to go see Timothée Chalamet In Marty Supreme Or Paul MESCAL In The history of sound When they can rather spend their time looking at various publications on social networks and looking at dozens of compilations of organized interviews Created by Stan accounts. Social media and the Internet as a whole broken down the barrier between the public and the interpreter. Although it has helped many people become extraordinarily famous, it is more difficult for actors to reach the traditional qualities of the movie star – namely the ability to carry a film on your shoulders to the box office. So that cinema stars again find this level of success, They must return to a time when they had greater mystique.

Cinema stars can benefit from being less accessible and more mysterious

Today, A large part of celebrity concerns authenticity and access. Influencers and internet stars find the public by offering an overview of their “real life”. Long interview podcasts featuring famous people have skyrocketed in popularity because we no longer want to hear an artist’s music, watching an actor’s films or seeing an athlete play –We want an inner look at how they think and who they are. Although it has done excellent internet content over the years, it’s a bit antithetic for all the experience of the movie star. The real cinema stars must remain somewhat unknowable. This is what makes them so attractive first.

Although our noisy and crowded landscape naturally led studios to feel the need to use a full-courted press strategy with regard to the promotion of the film these days, There is a real advantage for stars to play in their mystery And do not get too available. Not only does this guarantee that the public will associate an actor with their performance above all, but an air of recluse also creates a more inherent intrigue around a star and strengthens a greater demand for their upcoming projects. Moreover, Once the personal life of an actor is too linked to his public brand, his credibility on the screen in a given role begins to decrease. Although it is probably impossible for a famous figure to be completely removed from the internet and to highlight entirely these days, it is never a bad idea for the actors to limit their presence or their participation in social media in invasive press visits.

The history of sound

Release date

January 14, 2026

Execution time

127 minutes

Director

Oliver Hermanus

Writers

Ben Shattuck, Oliver Hermanus

Producers

The Haslam, Roa and Roa team, Ryan Ryan, Sara Murphy, Andrew Cortes, Lisa Ciffetti