Leading quality care when chances are stacked against you

In health care, the chances have never felt more stacked against those of us who try to provide quality care. As managers, we sail in an environment shaped by the assembly of financial pressures, Medicare cuts, complex regulations, labor shortages, constantly evolving policies and policy, and growing demand on the part of patients who need more time with limited access points.

Complexity is not theoretical; He is lived. Every day, I could get out of a meeting on the reduction of costs to enter another discussion on the expansion of services for an under-assured community. These are not competing priorities – they are parallel realities. The challenge for health leaders is to find a way to honor both without burning the teams that make it possible.

The list of challenges is long. The reimbursement models have opposite interests between hospitals and managed care models, each trying to maintain their margins. Sometimes it creates conflicts. The refusals of payers’ authorizations also create an important burden on patients and health entities.

Then add the growing administrative burden with documentation layers, declaration requirements and insurance authorization. Sometimes it becomes clear why many healthy leaders believe that they are building the plane while flying it.

What changes is the pace. These pressures do not arrive in slow waves; They hit everything in one go. And they don’t go away. If anything, the next decade will bring even faster changes – driven by technology, change of demography and the evolution of patient expectations.

I like to give this example: there is always a significant pressure to reduce the duration of stays in the hospital, and although this is sometimes possible, this can also lead to a higher risk of readmissions. Increased readmissions, in turn, can cause payment penalties. It is a balance between respecting all the key measures for which we are responsible, ensuring both the efficiency and quality of care.

Maintain the morale of the team in the midst of staff shortages, professional exhaustion and a crisis system

In this environment, the maintenance of the morale of the team is no longer a “smooth competence” of leadership. It is a strategic asset. You cannot provide coherent quality care if your employees are exhausted. I have seen the balance sheet of a crisis -focused system – the staff who starts their already tired changes and the clinicians who carry the weight of patient losses with them. Turnover has an advantageous price, not just the monetary cost. It is also delivered with a loss of unique talents, a loss of reputation and a degradation of organizational culture.

I think we all have a shelf life, and everyone is ultimately replaceable. Sometimes, when a person leaves, he can take several others to match the same work and maintain the same standards. Often, it takes even more time to bring these standards where they should be. This is why it is so important to invest in relationships and keep people nearby – it takes time and constant efforts.

The solution is not only to reduce the workload, although this counts. It is a question of building a culture where people feel seen, supported and part of something significant. A small example: when our team sailed in a particularly brutal section last winter, we have reserved time – not for another meeting – but for a while with meals together. No agenda. No minutes. Just a space for people to reconnect as human beings. Morale increased more than any change in policy that we could have deployed that week.

Why focus on quality (not just measures) motivates better results

The metrics count, but people count more. I often say that quality is when my mother came home after a stroke with a minimum loss of function because she was treated quickly and appropriately. It is when my friend survived seticemia – while unfortunately, no. This shows a quality difference. Quality is not only measured in five -star notes, but in a real life. It’s personal, so make it personal.

Measures help us measure performance, follow progress and identify the areas to be improved. But metrics are not the whole story – and chasing them to the detriment of patient care is a mistake. The duration of the stay is important, but you cannot unload a patient to an abyss.

One of the most powerful lessons I have learned is that quality is better measured in the patient’s experience, not just the duration of their hospital or their readmission rate.

The real success is when you can find a real balance between contradictory priorities, knowing that your true North is always in the best interest of the patient.

Build a culture that prioritizes compassion, transparency and responsibility

Your mission animates culture. Just as you should keep your mission alive, you have to work so hard to not only create a good culture, but maintain it. The best cultures are not accidental. They are built, often in the smallest interactions. A leader who admits that they have made a mistake sets the tone for transparency. A clinician who takes five more minutes to explain a compassion for diagnostic models. And when responsibility is managed fairly, it strengthens confidence rather than fear.

In any organization, responsibility works better when associated with empathy. Again, it is a question of keeping the human factor alive in medicine and business. If a doctor is missing a step in the documentation, the conversation begins by understanding what has led, not a punishment. This approach preserves not only relationships but improves compliance – because people know that they are not reduced to a single miss.

Humility, resilience and emotional consciousness as strategic leadership tools

The best leadership lesson I have learned is false belief in absolute. People are not in black and white; We are all shades of gray. Most of my learning occurred for times when I did not have all the answers and when I was not sure. At the start of my career, I thought that leaders had to project certainty. The experience and some humiliating failures taught me the opposite. The teams react better to honesty than to excessive confidence. They respect the leaders who are ready to say: “I don’t know, but I will discover it.”

Resilience does not consist of never falling; It’s about getting up and bringing others with you. And emotional consciousness is what allows you to notice what is behind that smile, when you can see the struggles behind the veil. These are not “additional” leadership skills; These are survival skills in health care today.

Closing thought

Directing health care when chances are stacked against you is not to eliminate challenges. It is a question of meeting them without losing sight of the reason why we chose this profession in the first place.

For me, it comes down to that: faced with the rise in requests, the narrowing of resources and a constant change, we must quickly be sure that people – patients and staff – are not figures, but stories that deserve to be heard. When we head this place, quality care is not only possible, it is inevitable.

Photo: Suwadee Sangsriuang, Getty Images

This message appears through the Medcity influencers program. Anyone can publish their point of view on business and innovation in health care on Medcity News through Medcity influencers. Click here to find out how.