Trump wants to drop a key principle from Maga. His biggest fans grow back

In a social article of truth over the weekend, President Trump suggested that he was randomly knowing a central element of his myth: that he was anti-war. This assertion, as questionable as possible, was adopted by some of its most frank supporters.
And, therefore, the perceived change has highlighted a rift in Maga which is now testing, because the movement is struggling with a secular question (decade). Has Magi have values in isolation and / or independent of Donald Trump? Or is the ideology of hordes subject to the whims of their master?
Tucker Carlson, unlikely, played a central role in the forcing of Trump supporters to really fight with the question, calling Trump to play with the idea not only to support Rhetorically Israel’s assault on Iran, and not only to defend Israel against the counterattacks of Iran, but to get the United States directly, to help Israel In addition to damage to its targets. The fact that Trump even thinks about the question of direct intervention spits in the face of anti-war feeling which works supposedly as a pillar of the Trump political movement, and betrays a fundamental misunderstanding on what the Americans be wary of “wars forever” to avoid. This is what Carlson and other Maga evangelists as Steve Bannon quickly underlined.
Carlson argued that Trump is “accomplice” of the war at this current stage, when he supports the assault of Israel and weighs whether to send American bombers to attack the installation of the nuclear enrichment of Iran. In a recent online interview with Carlson, Bannon argued that Trump, and whoever encouraging him to directly involve the United States in the current war, mainly abandons Maga. Bannon described “put an end to wars forever” as one of the three boards of the political movement.
“We have a bit of the impression that he is exploded during this war in Iran,” said Carlson about the Maga movement on Monday.
Trump replied by criticizing “Kooky Tucker Carlson” so as not to understand that “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon!” and distant his longtime ally and confidant.
“I don’t know what Tucker Carlson says,” he told journalists this week.
But it was not only Carlson and Bannon (a story of Maga’s prodigal son who suffered his own Trumpian distance) who publicly tries to remind the president of his supposed commitment to American isolationism. Former representative Matt Gaetz and representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) tried to publicly point out to whom and to what values he could betray, by actually declaring war on Iran with American direct intervention.
“Anyone who slips so that the United States is fully involved in the War of Israel / Iran is not America first / Maga,” Greene said in an article Twitter on Sunday.
But other members of the Congress are not sure that Trump’s prospect acting on his recently inflamed curiosity about the change of diet would be a kind of betrayal of the Maga movement. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) participated in Tucker’s show to argue against the point of view of the former Fox News host on the issue. In clips that are worth watching by yourself, Carlson makes Cruz very bad about the senator about the basic demography of the country.
Ted Cruz on Iran. Full interview tomorrow. pic.twitter.com/hjnwahanxz
– Tucker Carlson (@tuckerlson) June 18, 2025
A republican of the Chamber works with the Democrats to introduce a resolution that would prevent Trump from embarking on war with Iran without the permission of the Congress. There is a similar proposal to the Senate on which the senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) works. It remains to be seen if basic republicans at Congress beyond Massie will connect to the initiative. It is a republican majority Hellbent on the famous as much as possible of its authority to the executive branch, after all.
Wednesday morning, Bannon had dropped most of his violin act.
“I know, and in particular his skills as a communicator, that he will come to guide them,” Bannon told journalists during a breakfast organized by the Christian Science Monitor. “And the Maga movement – there will be some [who disagree]But the vast majority of the Maga movement Ira: “Look. We trust your judgment. You have traveled to us. We don’t like it. In fact, maybe we hate him. But, you know, we will get on board. “”
Hegseth will not say if Trump wants demonstrators to be slaughtered
Defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, testified today before the Senate of Armed Services Committee, during which he reproduced to a leading general on issues related to Trump potentially involved in Israel’s attacks against Iran and dodged questions on the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-Mi) tried to question Hegseth, in particular, about the federalization of the troops of the National Guard to repress the demonstrators in the city and on the directives of the president concerning the use of military force against civilians.
“Have you given order – to be able to shoot unarmed demonstrators in any way?” Slotkin asked. In response, Hegseth started laughing, for which Slotkin reprimanded him.
“What is it based on?” Hegseth asked.
Slotkin then raised an episode that the former defense secretary, Mark Esper, described in his memories, “a sacred oath”. During Trump’s first term, he wrote, the president asked him if demonstrators gathered in front of the White House in 2020 could be slaughtered.
“Can’t you just get them?” Just pull them in the legs or something like that? Trump asked, according to Esper.
When he faces Esper’s accusations, Hegseth would not seriously engage in a question that has taken on increased importance at a time when the Maga Saliva movement is increasingly violence against people who legally come together to protest against the policies of the Trump administration.
“Did you give the order that they can use the deadly force … I want the answer to be” no “, tell me it is” no “. Have you given the order? Slotkin asked.
“Senator, I would pay attention to what you read in the books and believing it,” he said. “Except for the Bible.”
DEMS house blocked against the inspection of ice detention cells at the bottom of Manhattan
By Gothamist:
American representatives Jerry Nadler and Dan Goldman, both Democrats from New York, were prohibited Wednesday to enter and inspect the US immigration and customs outfit cells at 26 Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan.
Deputy Director of the ICE field, Bill Joyce, told representatives that some immigrants slept overnight on the floors and benches in the facilities. But Joyce said that the site was not a detention center, that American representatives of the House are legally authorized to inspect, but rather a prohibited “treatment center”.
“We are very concerned about the conditions under the conditions of these immigrants,” said Goldman at a press conference after his visit. “What are they [ICE] concealment?”
In case you missed it
The Supreme Court allows the red states to deny care for young people
Trump has already completely corrupted an election
Grok’s “white genocide” responses show how generative AI can be armed
The most read story of yesterday
Reflections on the Iran Israel campaign and Donald Trump
What we read
The State Department restarts interviews on student visas with stricter rules on social networks
Inside the clashes between Trump and Gabbard
Trump approved private attack plans for Iran but held the final order