Maryland uses the fund of affordable care law to help pay abortion care: gunshots

Maryland has promulgated a law that authorizes special funds collected from ACA insurers to be used for abortion care.
Jonathan Newton / For the Washington Post / Getty Images
hide
tilting legend
Jonathan Newton / For the Washington Post / Getty Images
Maryland is the first state to exploit a 15 -year -old fund linked to the affordable care law, to help solve a more recent problem: helping pay the expenditure of patients who go to Maryland for an abortion.
The law is adopted this spring and entered into force on July 1.

Since the Supreme Court canceled Roe c. Wade In 2022, states like Maryland where abortion remains legal have increased an increase in abortion procedures, including patients who cannot obtain legal abortion in their country of origin. Many of these patients need financial assistance for the procedure itself or to pay the trips of other states and accommodation while they recover.
This financial aid is often provided by local and regional abortion funds, such as the Baltimore Abortion Fund. These are non -profit organizations that help individuals pay for breeding care, travel and related expenses.
But as more and more patients went to Maryland, some of the abortion funds have exhausted their resources. This exerts financial pressure on the suppliers of abortion in Maryland who wish to serve travelers, as well as not insured or low -income Marylanders in search of the same care.
Maryland clinicians made around 39,000 abortions last year, an increase of 26% compared to 2020, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a non -profit organization focused on sexual health research.
Maryland is now the first state of the country to adopt a law using a very public aspect of the affordable care law to help finance this care. The money comes from the costs paid by the insurance companies participating in the ACA markets.
Maryland’s move represents an innovative solution for states that have opened their doors to patients outside the state, but are struggling with logistics and increased clinical demand costs in a post-Deer landscape.
“This bill is super important for Maryland, we make sure that our clinics remain open,” said Maryland State del. Lesley Lopez, a democrat who sponsored the bill. “Maryland has been a leader on many reproductive bills for 30 years, and therefore in this way, this bill is part of this inheritance.
“It is also significant at the national level, because there are 25 or 26 other states which can take this model and run with. We are looking for California, Illinois, New York, these biggest states that are seated on hundreds of millions of dollars to take what we have done here in Maryland and implement it.”
Financial dilemma
Abortion is now limited or illegal in 22 states, jurisdictions like Maryland have become a destination for patients as close as neighboring Virginia-Western and with regard to Texas.
With six -year -old staff, the Baltimore Abortion Fund helps patients to pay for bus or plane tickets, staying in Maryland and sometimes even meals while traveling. The fund spends about a million dollars a year on this support. Calls to its confidential assistance line have increased by 50 to 60% each year since Deer Was canceled, said Lynn McCann-Yeh, the Codirector of the Fund.
The disbursements of the fund help on a weekly basis, dealing with funds as people call it. Often, the weekly attribution is exhausted after only one or two days.
“Sometimes it means that our assistance line closes within 24 to 48 hours at the start of the week, because there is simply too much request for the number of resources we have,” said McCann-Yeh.
“There are many, many more dozens of calls per week just receive a voice message saying that we have no support.”
A new way of paying abortions
To help, the Maryland legislature turned to a pot of money established under the Act respecting affordable care of 2010. Under the law, the States could decide to demand insurance regimes sold on the “markets” of the ACA to cover abortion. The plans had to charge minimum costs of at least $ 1 / month on each plan purchased on the market.
This money was then put in an account that would be used to pay when insured patients received abortion care.
More than 90% of patients from abortion care partners receive financial assistance thanks to various abortion funds.
Scott Maucione / WyPr
hide
tilting legend
Scott Maucione / WyPr
State accounts were necessary due to another federal law, the Hyde amendment, which prevents the federal government from paying abortions (with the exception of cases involving rape, incest or serious medical risk for the patient.)
Given that the federal government partially subsidizes the insurance plans sold on the ACA markets, commercial insurers had to use their own money to pay the monthly costs for each insurance lessee.
“Insurers have discreetly respected themselves from the ACA’s special rules, which leads to these separate accounts which contain millions of dollars intended for abortion coverage,” said Duffy.
Over time, the costs accumulated in such accounts have exceeded the withdrawals of abortion care for women on these insurance plans. The Maryland account has increased to $ 25 million and continues to collect about $ 3 million each year.
The new Maryland law enables the State Health Department to operate these funds and allocate up to $ 2.5 million per year in the abortion funds operating in Maryland, which can then use this money for travel patients, low -income patients from Maryland or those who have no insurance coverage at all.
“We know that we will be able to use these funds wisely and make sure that we do not refuse any patient because of their inability to pay,” said Ramsie Monk, director of development of Women’s Health Center of Maryland, a clinic on the border of Virginie-Western.
Without the help of the abortion funds, many patients seen in clinics would not be able to pay for their care, explains Dr. Diane Horvath, an OB / GYN at Partners in Abortion, a clinic at College Park, Maryland. Unlike some other clinics, which only offer abortion up to 16 weeks of pregnancy, abortion care partners can provide abortion later in pregnancy. These procedures are more complicated and more expensive.
More than 90% of patients from abortion care partners receive financial assistance thanks to various abortion funds.
“I would say that a typical patient that we probably see every week is someone who already has at least one child, he works a job that does not offer substantial leave for medical care, he may not offer health insurance, or the assurance that it offers does not cover abortion, especially when they come from the state and they have trouble and live a pay check to a pay check.”
Adversaries repel the role of the state
Maryland’s anti-abortion groups have opposed the bill, saying that it requires certain insurance consumers to pay for the procedures with which they may not agree.
“This bill uses the insurance premiums of women insured to interrupt the children of uninsured women,” said Laura Bogley, executive director of Maryland Right to Life on March 6.
“Many of these uninsured women are Maryland residents who are victims of trafficking in the state for the end of the quarter that are limited by other states.”
Supporters of the bill deny that patients on travel are treated when they travel their own will to find health care.
The law has officially entered into force on July 1, and the first bracket of money must be transferred to the state health service by the fall, before you can start subsidies.




