Let me connect a few points for you that can be a key element of Trump-Epstein’s drama and can even be what Trump has tried to keep in these files. I’m not sure of what we are dealing with here. But I think it’s important.
Yesterday, President Mike Johnson was on the hill to talk to journalists who directed Trump Defense on Epstein files. It looks like fairly standard stuff – and then he says this: “When he heard the rumor he launched for the first time [Epstein] from Mar-A-Lago. He was an FBI informant who tried to reduce this thing. It’s a strange moment. Because Johnson says it in this kind in a quirky way and without explanation as if it is a role in the fall of the litany. Involved in Epstein’s crimes, Trump is a good secret guy in the shadows, the guy who came out of the spotlight helped the authorities to translate Epstein into justice.
Total fantasy, right?
Well, it reminded me of something that I saw in one of these recent interviews with journalist Michael Wolff, who was in the media to let everyone know that he has a large amount of interviews recorded with Epstein of the first presidency of Trump, but before his reariching and possible suicide.
Wolff said Epstein suspected Trump was the guy who pulled him to the authorities. So maybe a version of Johnson’s claim is not so far-fetched. But of course, that wouldn’t quip at all. In fact, it involves Trump of Trump as bad as everything we have heard to date. You can’t say what you don’t know. Trump was able to store Epstein because he knew everything about his operation and had had for years. They were friends close to the fight against the years, celebrating and tried to go up, in competition with young women in the bed. That it also included girls under the age of 18 for Trump, we don’t know with certainty. But we have abundant proofs of their carrouration and their bro-un show with women just over 18 years old. Even if he never touched a girl under the age of 18, Trump clearly knew that Epstein was. If he is the one who roted Epstein to the authorities leading to his advocacy agreement in 2008, this only confirms his knowledge more clearly.
But the details of the reasons why Trump seems to have turned to Epstein is also the key. Wolff presents the details starting right after minute 32 in this interview, which you can watch on YouTube. Many things happen here. So I will try to guide you through the key points. (For more details and flavor, I strongly recommend looking at this five or six minutes of the interview.)
Epstein was trying to buy an area in southern Florida. He brought Trump to see him once. Shortly after, Epstein discovered that Trump had gone behind his back and had placed a higher and ultimately successful offer on the property. He had torn it down with a much higher offer. The problem was that the whole Trump Empire in 2004 wins at the forefront of bankruptcy. It made no sense that Trump came from $ 41 million to buy this property. Epstein suspected Trump acting as a front for a Russian oligarch as a money laundering program. And in fact Trump did Purchase and return the succession two years later to a Russian oligarch named Dmitry Rybolovlev for $ 95 million, a profit of more than $ 50 million.
Epstein was upset for his own reasons (he wanted the domain). But he also suspected the money laundering program. He therefore threatened Trump that he would put everything at the opening of the whole thanks to a series of prosecution. Above at the same time, the authorities obtained a tip in Epstein’s activities that started the investigation which led to its possible advocacy agreement in 2008.
Two of these points are well known. The transaction with the Russian oligarch has been largely written and has been the subject of criminal probes. Of course, Trump denies that it was money laundering. But this part of this story is well known. It is also well known that Trump and Epstein came across this real estate transaction. These two parts of what I explain are established parties in the history of Trump. What is new is the idea that Trump was either the key source that started Epstein’s investigation, or one of them and did this to retaliate against Epstein threats and protect himself against being exposed in a money laundering system.
I cannot insist on this point enough: you cannot say what you do not know. This is not an accusation. It is a formal logic. So, even if we accept the idea that Trump played a role in the fall of Epstein, it is not exempt. This shows what we have suspected for a long time: that Trump had known the Epstein operation for years and agreed with that. (This supposes for the moment that he was not a direct participant – it is the weekend, I am generous.) He did not make a call when Epstein threatened to exhibit a money laundering program.
Wolff said it a few weeks ago, apparently on the basis of registered interviews from 2018 and 2019. But last night, I saw some articles from this period which strongly suggested something like that. So I suspect that journalists had heard something about it, but I couldn’t quite nail it. In other words, I think this is known as a rumor at least for some time.
So why did Johnson say that?
He is conceivable, I suppose, that he riffed just and that there is nothing. But it is a helluva riff. I don’t think you’re only Spitball and landed on the idea that the President of the United States was a confidential source that had knowledge inside and started Epstein’s investigation. My best supposition is that Johnson said that because Epstein was right and Trump did Rat it to the authorities. But as we said, it’s not a good story for Trump, so why say it? Again, the best explanation is that it is in these files on which the doj is seated. The White House fears that it will not know and therefore they put the best turn there. Trump was a real Bruce Wayne Life Type Richie, Wheeling and Trawing by day, helping the authorities to eliminate the bad guys in the shadows. With Trump’s most ardent supporters, they could get some traction with this. But again, as indicated above, it is actually super overwhelming. Yes, I knew he was a big pedophile and that we were great friends and that we celebrated together all the time and I agreed with that. But then he tried to exhibit my money laundering program so I called my friends at the FBI. I don’t think it’s a big story.
Needless to say, I gathered several links in a chain here. There is the commentary by Johnson’s hand, the fact that what Epstein suspected or said that he suspected is not necessarily what happened, there is the lack of direct evidence for the authorities of Trump. But I think that if you shoot the channel, you will find that each link of the chain is actually quite strong. So it’s worth keeping an eye because I think Johnson said it for a reason.
