Ind Vs Eng | “He has only to blame”: the reckless shot of Rishabh Pant is expanding the debate | Cricket news

New Delhi: India’s Rishabh pants underwent a feet fracture during the current Manchester test against England after trying a reverse scan on day 1. The injury occurred when he was on 37, while Chris Woakes delivered a Yorker who struck the right toe of pants, apparently causing the fracture.Despite the backhand, Pant resumed his sleeves day 2 and fought through the pain to cut half a grainy half before falling to Jofra Archer. His injury has now questioned his availability for the second rounds of India and the conversations revived on the use of injury substitutes in the test cricket.Former England captain Geoffrey Boycott, speaking about the Podcast Telegraph, criticized the pant’s shooting and said that the injury was avoidable.“It’s always sad when a player is injured and affects his ability to play a role in the game, especially someone as talented as him. But he has only himself,” said boycott.

“They were well in control, striking Orthodox – there was no need to try something scandalous. Rishabh tries incredible blows. When they stand out, people are surprised and encourage him, and it is the essence of his striker. But when they can’t look silly. India has built a strong position. Some might say that it is its nature.

The incident sparked a new debate on the permission of substitutions as well as for tests.Addressing Talksport Cricket, the former striker of England David Lloyd offered his point of view: “I am probably against the runners, but I am in favor of the substitutes of external injuries. He opens a box of worms, but if it’s a break and medically, he came out for six weeks, then maybe a replacement as in the same way. ”