George Clooney is one of the most appreciated and successful actors in the world, which only makes him much more surprising to learn that his very first film was a total disaster. “Grizzy II: Revenge” was a horror thriller about a grizzly grizzly man who is deadly. However, despite its shooting in 1983, the film was put on the shelf because it could not finish some of its special effects due to a lack of funding. But when it was initially delayed only for a few years, the “Grizzly” continuation was postponed for four decades, finally released to the public in 2021.
You might think that Clooney would be excited for his planned film to finally release, but the actor reacted more to news with light terror. “I haven’t seen it – and I don’t know I want,” Clooney said in the sun in 2021. “It was a bad time for hair and clothes.”
The character of Clooney in the film indeed sports a mule and a jeans. He looks very Stereotypical of the 1980s; Far from the kind of the sweet and well -dressed man that we are used to playing. This does not help that the rest of “Grizzly II” is not great either. In fact, nostalgia for the 80s has not at all helped the film with regard to its critical reception. “It is not even” so bad that it is good “, wrote Dennis Harvey for Variety,” it’s just a half -assembly collection of pieces that will never be whole. “
The film was so bad, in fact, that Clooney compared him unfavorably to the most extensive film of his career. “I feel that I found something worse than” Batman & Robin “,” he noted.
If you want a good Grizzly Rampage movie, watch elsewhere
Part of the reason why the reception at “Grizzly II” whistled so negatively was false advertising. Despite a strong presence with George Clooney, Laura Dern and Charlie Sheen in his promotional material, the film does not really present these actors in terms of significantly. Clooney himself is only in the film for a few minutes, so it is dishonest to put his name before and in the center. Of course, these are huge names now, but in 1983, they were more likely to be presented as red shirts than as tracks. But 40 years later, these three are now easily the biggest players associated with the film, so it is logical that his marketing team wants to take this.
The other reason why “Grizzly II” collapsed so hard is because, just like the original film “Grizzly”, it is clear that it only exists to enjoy the success of “Jaws”. The film presents a dangerous animal on an outburst and a figure of authority which does not care to stop it. What he does not present is the charm and competence that made success “jaws”. And let’s be real: sharks are more cinematographic than bears, so this kind of premise was never going to surpass the original. There are many better eliminations of “jaws” to choose.
Really, if you want to see a bear outburst film that delivers its marketing, you better consult the “cocaine bear” led by Elizabeth Banks. This horror comedy in 2023 was not a high-tech masterpiece either, but at least it did not lie in marketing on the quantity of its actors in the film. Regarding the concept of “jaws” but with a bear “, it was the banks that really nailed him. I mean, look at this delicious nonsense:
