The exorcist Perhaps one of the greatest horror films of all time, but only one other longtime franchise film is even worth watching. Based on the eponymous novel by William Peter Blatty, 1973 The exorcist Delivered the most frightening cinematographic experiences that moviegoers have ever seen to this point, and has rarely been equaled in terms of quality. The story of a little girl possessed by a malicious demon was sufficiently painful, but the insistence of director William Friedkin on anchored cinema made all the nightmare because it was so real.
In the middle of a multitude of paths and copying films, a sequel finally materialized in 1977 with the release of Exorcist II: Heretics. Unfortunately, the rest was a confusing mess that was clearly lacking in concentration, and the franchise was placed on the ice for more than a decade. Author William Peter Blatty was finally exploited to adapt his novel, Legionand the project has transformed into THE Exorcist III. Although it has little attention at the time, Exorcist III turned out to be a worthy successor to the original, and is always the only other film in the six -films franchise that is worth watching.
Exorcist III is the only good exorcist suite
An imperfect but ultimately strong suite of the exorcist
THE Exorcist The franchise was almost killed by the failure of Exorcist II: HereticsBut William Peter Blatty quietly wrote a novel that was the real series of classical history. Released in 1983, Legion Wordsmith’s vision of monitoring The exorcistAnd he was responsible for directing an adaptation of his own book. He took until 1990 and was strongly modified by the studio, but Legion finally press the big screen as Exorcist III. The basic node of history is a mystery of murder involving the detective Kinderman and a case of serial killer of his past.
The writing of Blatty explores religion and guilt, and he challenges the spectator to think while scary them halfway.
Although it is significantly different from The exorcist,, The third film has its own tone which distinguishes it while remaining faithful to the basic ideas of the original. Partly psychological thriller and partly the brutal slasher film, Exorcist III mainly concerns the obsession of detective Kinderman for the past. The experienced detective is haunted by the brutal cases on which he worked, and he fights with his failures and the consequences of failure again in the future. Blatty’s writing explores religion and guilt, and he challenges the spectator to think while scary them halfway with effective jumps.
Related
The exorcist suite John Carpenter has passed – because she had no exorcisms
The horror icon John Carpenter once considered the direction of an exorcist suite, only to reject it by realizing that it had no real exorcism.
That being said, Exorcist III is not a perfect film, and The interference of the studio almost derailed the entire project. Legion Did not present exorcism, and a small secondary intrigue was paved to allow the film to be at the height of its name. The future cuts of the film improved the theatrical version of 1990, and the additional bits do not take too much from the director’s vision. Although it is not as scary as The exorcist,, The third film is the only another film in the franchise that has an idea of an original idea.
The exorcist The franchise includes:
|
Movie |
Year of exit |
Rotten score tomatoes |
|---|---|---|
|
The exorcist |
1973 |
78% |
|
Exorcist II: Heretics |
1977 |
10% |
|
Exorcist III |
1990 |
58% |
|
Exorcist: the start |
2004 |
11% |
|
Dominion: prequel to the exorcist |
2005 |
29% |
|
The exorcist: believer |
2023 |
22% |
Why exorcist III succeeds while other consequences failed
The rest tells a convincing story and is not a cynical arbine
Exorcist III is always the only good suite of the original film, and this is largely due to the fact that He actually has something new to say. Horror consequences are known to be free, and it is not uncommon to see a villain Slasher come back again and again for more chaos. However, The exorcist is a unique horror property because it does not naturally lend itself to the consequences. Although the film was a little far from the original setting of Blatty as a mystery of murder, the horror always feels very closed.
Exorcist III was a modest success at the box office, totaling nearly $ 40 million (via Mojo Office Box).
Exorcist II It made the mistake of trying to focus again on Regan, although his painful experience was completed after the first film. Kinderman is clearly a better character to direct a sequelSince its detective position places it in unusual places to start. Exorcist III Also avoids a common trap in other Exorcist Films by not trying to explain how the demon works. The mystery around the return of the Gemini killer is quite good, and Explaining too much is forced to wing history.
Finally, Exorcist III actually justifies its own existence. The first continuation had a cynical advantage and looked like a film directed by a committee. The third film is clearly the vision of William Peter Blatty, and he managed to give life to his ideas on the big screen. No one understood The exorcist Better than the man who created all the franchise, and it gave Exorcist III A lightness from the start. Blatty also happens to be an excellent filmmaker, which is not given among the literary types that can sit on the director’s chair.
The exorcist
9/ 10
- Release date
-
December 26, 1973
- Execution time
-
122 minutes
- Director
-
William Friedkin
- Writers
-
William Peter Blatty
- Prequel (s)
-
Exorcist: The Beginning, Dominion: prequel to the exorcist
