Efficient mitochondrial A-to-G base editors for the generation of mitochondrial disease models
Wallace, D. C. Mitochondrial genetic medicine. Nat. Genet. 50, 1642–1649 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kim, J. S. & Chen, J. Base editing of organellar DNA with programmable deaminases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 34–45 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cho, S. I. et al. Targeted A-to-G base editing in human mitochondrial DNA with programmable deaminases. Cell 185, 1764–177 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, G. et al. Gene editing and its applications in biomedicine. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 660–700 (2022).
Google Scholar
Silva-Pinheiro, P. & Minczuk, M. The potential of mitochondrial genome engineering. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 199–214 (2022).
Google Scholar
Stewart, J. B. Current progress with mammalian models of mitochondrial DNA disease. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 44, 325–342 (2021).
Google Scholar
Russell, O. M., Gorman, G. S., Lightowlers, R. N. & Turnbull, D. M. Mitochondrial diseases: hope for the future. Cell 181, 168–188 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bayona-Bafaluy, M. P., Blits, B., Battersby, B. J., Shoubridge, E. A. & Moraes, C. T. Rapid directional shift of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in animal tissues by a mitochondrially targeted restriction endonuclease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14392–14397 (2005).
Google Scholar
Gammage, P. A. et al. Genome editing in mitochondria corrects a pathogenic mtDNA mutation in vivo. Nat. Med. 24, 1691–1695 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bacman, S. R. et al. MitoTALEN reduces mutant mtDNA load and restores tRNAAla levels in a mouse model of heteroplasmic mtDNA mutation. Nat. Med. 24, 1696–1700 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zekonyte, U. et al. Mitochondrial targeted meganuclease as a platform to eliminate mutant mtDNA in vivo. Nat. Commun. 12, 3210 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rees, H. A. & Liu, D. R. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 770–788 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mok, B. Y. et al. A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing. Nature 583, 631–637 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, J. et al. Discovery of deaminase functions by structure-based protein clustering. Cell 186, 3182–3195 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mi, L. et al. DddA homolog search and engineering expand sequence compatibility of mitochondrial base editing. Nat. Commun. 14, 874 (2023).
Google Scholar
Guo, J. et al. A DddA ortholog-based and transactivator-assisted nuclear and mitochondrial cytosine base editors with expanded target compatibility. Mol. Cell 83, 1710–1724 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sun, H. et al. Developing mitochondrial base editors with diverse context compatibility and high fidelity via saturated spacer library. Nat. Commun. 14, 6625 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lim, K., Cho, S. I. & Kim, J. S. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA editing in human cells with zinc finger deaminases. Nat. Commun. 13, 366 (2022).
Google Scholar
Willis, J. C. W., Silva-Pinheiro, P., Widdup, L., Minczuk, M. & Liu, D. R. Compact zinc finger base editors that edit mitochondrial or nuclear DNA in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Commun. 13, 7204 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lee, S., Lee, H., Baek, G. & Kim, J. S. Precision mitochondrial DNA editing with high-fidelity DddA-derived base editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 378–386 (2023).
Google Scholar
Phan, H. T. L., Lee, H. & Kim, K. Trends and prospects in mitochondrial genome editing. Exp. Mol. Med. 55, 871–878 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yi, Z. et al. Strand-selective base editing of human mitochondrial DNA using mitoBEs. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 498–509 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hu, J. et al. Strand-preferred base editing of organellar and nuclear genomes using CyDENT. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 936–945 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cho, S. I. et al. Engineering TALE-linked deaminases to facilitate precision adenine base editing in mitochondrial DNA. Cell 187, 95–109 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Precise modelling of mitochondrial diseases using optimized mitoBEs. Nature 639, 735–745 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fan, Y. et al. Leveraging base excision repair for efficient adenine base editing of mitochondrial DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02608-w (2025).
Google Scholar
Gorman, G. S. et al. Mitochondrial diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2, 16080 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A*T to G*C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhou, C. et al. Off-target RNA mutation induced by DNA base editing and its elimination by mutagenesis. Nature 571, 275–278 (2019).
Google Scholar
Grunewald, J. et al. CRISPR DNA base editors with reduced RNA off-target and self-editing activities. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1041–1048 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rees, H. A., Wilson, C., Doman, J. L. & Liu, D. R. Analysis and minimization of cellular RNA editing by DNA adenine base editors. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax5717 (2019).
Google Scholar
Richter, M. F. et al. Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 883–891 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Directed evolution of adenine base editors with increased activity and therapeutic application. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 892–900 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. Re-engineering the adenine deaminase TadA-8e for efficient and specific CRISPR-based cytosine base editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 663–672 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. Engineering a precise adenine base editor with minimal bystander editing. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 101–110 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jeong, Y. K. et al. Adenine base editor engineering reduces editing of bystander cytosines. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1426–1433 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tu, T. et al. A precise and efficient adenine base editor. Mol. Ther. 30, 2933–2941 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lapinaite, A. et al. DNA capture by a CRISPR-Cas9-guided adenine base editor. Science 369, 566–571 (2020).
Google Scholar
Arbab, M. et al. Determinants of Base Editing Outcomes from Target Library Analysis and Machine Learning. Cell 182, 463–480 e430 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kim, H. S., Jeong, Y. K., Hur, J. K., Kim, J. S. & Bae, S. Adenine base editors catalyze cytosine conversions in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1145–1148 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mok, B. Y. et al. CRISPR-free base editors with enhanced activity and expanded targeting scope in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1378–1387 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bacman, S. R. et al. Specific elimination of mutant mitochondrial genomes in patient-derived cells by mitoTALENs. Nat. Med. 19, 1111–1113 (2013).
Google Scholar
Yan, D. et al. High-efficiency and multiplex adenine base editing in plants using new TadA variants. Mol. Plant 14, 722–731 (2021).
Google Scholar
Catarino, C. B. et al. Characterization of a Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) family harboring two primary LHON mutations m.11778G>A and m.14484T>C of the mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrion 36, 15–20 (2017).
Google Scholar
Macmillan, C. et al. Pedigree analysis of French Canadian families with T14484C Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy. Neurology 50, 417–422 (1998).
Google Scholar
Thorburn, D. R., Rahman, J., and Rahman, S. Mitochondrial DNA-Associated Leigh Syndrome and NARP. In GeneReviews((R)), M. P. Adam, J. Feldman, G. M. Mirzaa, R. A. Pagon, S. E. Wallace, L. J. H. Bean, K. W. Gripp, and A. Amemiya, eds. (1993).
Khoo, A. et al. Progressive myoclonic epilepsy due to rare mitochondrial ND6 mutation, m.14487T>C. BMJ Neurol. Open 3, e000180 (2021).
Google Scholar
Becker, S. & Boch, J. TALE and TALEN genome editing technologies. Gene and Genome Editing 2, 100007 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kytovuori, L., Gardberg, M., Majamaa, K. & Martikainen, M. H. The m.7510T>C mutation: Hearing impairment and a complex neurologic phenotype. Brain Behav. 7, e00859 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mutai, H., Watabe, T., Kosaki, K., Ogawa, K. & Matsunaga, T. Mitochondrial mutations in maternally inherited hearing loss. BMC Med. Genet 18, 32 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ding, Y. et al. The role of mitochondrial DNA mutations in hearing loss. Biochem. Genet. 51, 7–8 (2013).
Google Scholar
Xiao, Y. L., Wu, Y. & Tang, W. An adenine base editor variant expands context compatibility. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1442–1453 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jiang, F. & Doudna, J. A. CRISPR-Cas9 Structures and Mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 46, 505–529 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yin, L., Shi, K. & Aihara, H. Structural basis of sequence-specific cytosine deamination by double-stranded DNA deaminase toxin DddA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1153–1159 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kim, Y. B. et al. Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 371–376 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. A mitochondrial disease model is generated and corrected using engineered base editors in rat zygotes. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02684-y (2025).
Chen, L. et al. Adenine transversion editors enable precise, efficient A•T-to-C•G base editing in mammalian cells and embryos. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 638–650 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Increasing the efficiency and targeting range of cytidine base editors through fusion of a single-stranded DNA-binding protein domain. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 740–750 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. Generation of obese rat model by transcription activator-like effector nucleases targeting the leptin receptor gene. Sci. China Life Sci. 60, 152–157 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cheng, Y. et al. Degraded cortical temporal processing in the valproic acid-induced rat model of autism. Neuropharmacology 209, 109000 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hwang, G. H. et al. Web-based design and analysis tools for CRISPR base editing. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 542 (2018).
Google Scholar
