The GOP tax bill would facilitate regulations on firearm silencers and certain types of firearms

The huge Package of tax and expenditure discounts President Donald Trump wants on his desk by July 4, would loosen the regulations on fire arms and certain types of rifles and hunting rifles, advancing a long -standing priority of the firearms industry as republican leaders in the House and Senate Try to win enough votes To adopt the bill.

The arrangement of firearms was requested for the first time in the house by the representative of Georgia Andrew Clyde, a republican owner of the firearms store who had initially opposed to the largest tax package. The House bill would remove the silencer – called “suppressants” by the firearms industry – from a law of the 1930s which regulates firearms which are considered to be the most dangerous, eliminating a tax of $ 200 while eliminating a layer of checking of the history.

The Senate has kept the layout on the silencer in its version of the bill and extended, adding short or sawn guns.

The Republicans who have long supported changes, as well as the firearms industry, say that the tax has reached second amendments. They say that the silencers are mainly used by hunters and target shooters for sport.

“Heavy regulations and unconstitutional taxes should not hinder the protection of the hearing of the owners of American firearms,” ​​said Clyde, who owns two firearms in Georgia and often wears an assault rifle -shaped pin on his reverse.

Democrats are fighting to arrest the disposition, which was revealed a few days after two Minnesota State legislators were killed in their homes, while the bill accelerates across the Senate. They argue that the relaxation of regulations on the silencer could facilitate criminals and active shooters to hide their weapons.

Related | The Republicans jump to defend the Senator’s rotic comments on the murders of Minnesota

“Parents do not want the silencers in their streets, the police do not want the silencers in their streets,” said the Democrat chief of the Senate, Chuck Schumer, DN.Y.

The armed language has broad support among the Republicans and has received little attention as president of the Mike Johnson Chamber, R-La., And the head of the majority of the Senate John Thune, RS.D., works to settle the differences within the party on the reductions in medical and energy tax credits, among other questions. But it is only hundreds of policies and expenses included to encourage members to vote for legislation that could have major implications if the bill is promulgated in a few weeks, as Trump wants.

The inclusion of the arrangement is also a lively climate turn in Washington only three years ago when the Democrats, like the Republicans now, controlled the Congress and the White House and pushed through Bipartite firearms legislation. The bill increased the history checks of certain buyers under the age of 21, facilitated the firearms of potentially dangerous people and sent millions of dollars to mental health services in schools.

Spent in the summer of 2022, just a few weeks after shooting of 19 children and two adults In a school in Uvalde, Texas, he was the most important legislative response to armed violence for decades.

Three years later, while they were trying to take advantage of their consolidated power in Washington, the Republicans pack the greatest number of their long -standing priorities as possible, including the legislation on firearms, in the massive and variable bill that Trump called “beautiful”.

“I am happy that the Senate joins the House to defend the second amendment and our Constitution, and I will continue to fight for these priorities while the Senate works to adopt a major bill of President Trump,” said Texas senator John Cornyn, who was one of the main negotiators of the Bipartiière projection in 2022, but which is now confronted with a main challenge next.

Related | Senate republicans are pressure for more Medicaid cuts, voters are damned

If the provisions of firearms remain in broader legislation and it is adopted, the silencer and rifles and hunting rifles at short-circuit would lose an additional layer of regulation to which they are subject to the national law on firearms, adopted in the 1930s in response to concerns concerning mafia violence. They would always be subject to the same regulations that apply to most other firearms – and this includes possible gaps that allow certain firearms buyers to avoid checks of history when firearms are sold in private or online.

Larry Keane of the National Sports Sports Foundation, who supports legislation, says that changes are aimed at helping shooters to target and hunters to protect their hearing. He maintains that the use of silencers in violent crimes is rare. “All that he is never supposed to do is reducing the report of the firearm to hear safe levels,” explains Keane.

Speaking on the ground before the bill adopted the House, the representative Clyde said that the bill restores the rights to the second amendment of “more than 90 years of draconian taxes”. Clyde said Johnson included his legislation in the broader bill “with the purest reason”.

“Who asked for it? I asked,” said Clyde, who finally voted for the bill after adding the disposition of the firearm silencer.

Clyde responded to the representative Maxwell Frost, a 28 -year -old Florida democrat who went to the ground and asked who was responsible for the supply of firearms. Frost, who was an activist for the control of firearms before being elected at the Congress, called himself a member of the “generation of mass fire” and said that the bill would help “manufacturers of firearms to earn more money on the death of children and our people”.

Among other concerns, control defenders claim that less regulation for silencer could make the police more difficult to stop an active shooter.

“There is a reason why the silencers have been regulated for almost a century: they make much more difficult for the police and passers -by to react quickly to the shots,” said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for the safety of firearms.

Schumer and other Democrats try to convince the Senate parliamentarian to abandon the language as she examines the bill for political provisions which are not linked to the budget.

“The Democrats of the Senate will fight on this provision at the parliamentary level and all the other levels with everything we have,” said Schumer earlier this month.

Campaign action