Candace Owens claims she spoke to Erika Kirk about TPUSA officials who allegedly had “advance knowledge” of Charlie Kirk’s death.
Candace Owens claimed she spoke to Erika Kirk about TPUSA officials who allegedly had “advance knowledge” of the death of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. She did so during her appearance on December 18 on Piers Morgan uncensored.
While discussing what she believed happened before and after the Charlie Kirk shooting at Utah Valley University, Owens suggested that Turning Point USA’s internal numbers merited closer examination.
Piers Morgan directly asked her if anyone within the organization might have known about the murder in advance, prompting Owens to claim she had serious concerns about two specific individuals. She claimed to have shared this information privately with Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow, as well as Justin Strife.
“There are specifically two people at Turning Point USA and I have communicated this information to Erik and Justin Strife and I would not be surprised if they knew about Charlie Kirk’s assassination,” Owens said.
Morgan then asked Owens if she had any concrete evidence to support such a serious allegation. In response, Owens explained that although she had suspicions, she was not willing to publicly identify the individuals involved without definitive confirmation.
“I’m not going to name these people. I’m not going to name these people. Okay. Because it’s not fair for me to name these people until I know for sure that they (are involved),” she explained.
When asked if she privately shared the names of the alleged suspicious employees with Erika Kirk, Candace Owens confirmed that she did so without hesitation.
Piers Morgan requested clarification, summarizing her statement by stating that she had given Erika Kirk the names of two current Turning Point USA employees who she believed may have been involved in the preparations leading to Charlie Kirk’s murder.
Owens responded by reiterating that she was not making a direct accusation but rather offering advice on areas where she believed further investigation should be focused.
“I told them that if I were in your shoes, these would be two employees that I would look at in more detail,” Owens added.
What else did Candace Owens say to Erika Kirk during her chat with Piers Morgan?
During the aforementioned discussion, Candace Owens claimed that she spoke privately with Erika Kirk about certain Turning Point USA officials who she believed may have known about Charlie Kirk’s death. As Owens outlined these claims, Piers Morgan asked her if she had any factual evidence to support such serious implications.
“And what evidence do you have that they knew about the murder?” » he asked
Candace Owens acknowledged that she did not have definitive proof, explaining that the lack of concrete evidence was precisely why she had refrained from publicly naming individuals.
Piers Morgan later raised concerns about the ethical implications of Owens’ private communication with Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk. He argued that suggesting possible involvement without proof could be problematic.
“So you don’t have any evidence, but you tell the widow that these two people might have been involved in the murder. But you see the problem,” Morgan added.
Owens objected to the way Morgan framed the issue, insisting he was misrepresenting what he said.
She reiterated that she never asserted certainty or assigned culpability, but rather shared concerns that she believed merited further investigation. Owens said encouraging further investigation was not the same as making an accusation, and she described that process as part of an “investigation” rather than a public allegation.
Candace Owens clarified by urging the public to trust their instincts when something is wrong, suggesting that continued questioning is appropriate until verifiable evidence emerges.
Owens stressed that naming individuals should only happen when concrete evidence exists, noting that while she did not have such evidence, she found some inconsistencies troubling and had expressed discomfort privately.
Candace Owens also said that the information she gave to Erika Kirk came from a third party, but she refused to release those details publicly. She explained that the individuals involved were private citizens and that it would be irresponsible to release unverified allegations.
“Unless I’m completely sure that they actually had something to do, like, here’s the smoking gun, I’m not going to name these people. But the people that I’ve named so far are people that I believe are engaged in a cover-up,” Candace Owens added.
After the death of Charlie Kirk, Erika Kirk took over as CEO of Turning Point USA.
Candace Owens, meanwhile, continues to analyze the conspiracy surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death on her YouTube podcast.
Edited by Shayari Roy
