Sport News

Bryan Mbeumo transfer fees criticized by the former player

Bryan Mbeumo reacts during the defeat of Manchester United against Brentford (Photo by Justin Setterfield / Getty Images)

The former defender of Arsenal and Chelsea William Gallas criticized Manchester United for spending “crazy” money for Bryan Mbeumo this summer.

The Cameroon International joined Brentford in July, with regard to the initial costs of 65 million pounds Sterling at the time by BBC Sport.

Mbeumo had shone during his stay in Brentford, but he did not start the Old Trafford, and Gallas begins to question the logic of spending so much for him.

Many fans will surely have been happy to see a talent like Mbeumo join, but perhaps even in summer, 65 million pounds sterling seemed to pay for him.

Has Manchester united on the transfer of Bryan Mbeumo?

Addressing Gambling Zone, as cited by the metro, Gallas struck the type of fee that players move for these days, with Mbeumo apparently an excellent example.

Bryan Mbeumo in action for Manchester United (Photo by Alex Livesey / Getty Images)

“They have Bryan Mbeumo, and the player is good enough for most sides, but I don’t know if you can justify these transfer costs,” said Gallas.

“They spent a lot of money and have not really changed too much from their 11th first choice.

“We are still talking about money these days, and I know that prices continue to increase each year, but come on. It seems crazy. “

How do Mbeumo fees compare to other similar players?

There were a few other left-handed wingers who moved this summer, so how do the Mbeumo costs compare to them?

BBC Sport reported that the passage from Noni Madueke from Chelsea to Arsenal was cheaper, at around 48.5 million pounds sterling, although it does not seem almost as good in the Premier League last year as a Mbeumo.

Anthony Elanga is another similar player style, but his passage from Nottingham Forest to Newcastle was also cheaper at 55 million pounds Sterling, according to BBC Sport.

Tottenham New-Boy Mohammed Kudus was also cheaper, also about 55 million pounds sterling, according to the BBC Sport report at the time.

Maybe Gallas has one point? Let us know your opinions in the comments!

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button