Injustice for all is a weekly series on how the Trump administration is trying to arm the judicial system and those who retaliate.
JD Vance is almost sure that he knows the law better than the chief judge
Is there a heavier and notable villain than the former successful author of the JD Vance airport book?
Vance, whose legal career consisted of just under two years as a business lawyer after having spent most of his career in the school of law to write a book where he was moving his own family to catapult himself to glory, said Ross Douthat of the New York Times this week that chief judge John Roberts simply does not understand what the judiciary does:
I think you see an effort of the courts to literally overthrow the will of the American people. To be clear, it is not most of the courts. But I recently saw an interview with chief judge Roberts where he declared that the role of the court was to verify the excesses of the executive. I thought it was a deeply bad feeling. It is half of his work. The other half of his work is to check the excesses of his own branch. You cannot have a country where the American people continue to elect the application of immigration and that the courts tell the American people that they are not allowed to have what they voted for. This is where we are right now.
Good god, guy. The Roberts Court invented immunity for Donald Trump. The Roberts Court is the reason why you have a job. The Roberts Court is fully controlled by your allies. The executive is not exactly besieged here, Big Baby.
But apart from the usual groans of Vance on the way in which the Trump administration is oppressed, this is also spectacularly headless in terms of the operation of the powers of powers.
Vance’s theory of governance seems to be the one on which the administration as a whole has settled: because people elected Trump, they implicitly approved each future action that Trump takes, so that the courts cannot govern otherwise. If they govern against the administration, I think, it violates the separation of powers.
Such theory, of course, makes courts entirely useless, which can actually be the objective of Vance. But while the Republic is always standing, or crawls, or anything we are doing at the moment, the literal work of the judiciary is to verify the excesses of the other branches, and vice versa. Perhaps at the Fancy Yale Law School, they do not cover the basic separation of the powers and the structure of the government and pass the right to let you make a independent study Where do you write your airport book?
Trump rushes towards the Supreme Court – Once again
Another week, another Trump trip to the highest courtyard in the country. This time, it’s to ask for a emergency injunction So that the administration is not even required to explain why the illegal machine of Elon Musk, the government, the so-called Ministry of Effectiveness of the Government, is not subject to the law on freedom of information.
Yes, you read it well. The government is even fighting why Doge would fall under the Foia in response to a trial of citizens for the responsibility of ethics in Washington.
General solicitor John Sauer, another MJ official who obtained his job because he was one of the myriads of lawyer for the criminal defense of Trump, tries to run the fact that the lower court ordered a very modest discovery in the structure of Doge – in particular, certain depositions and a production of documents – as one of the most intrusive and the most intrusive things imaginable. He said to court Giving the crew any information justifying its DOGE assertion is not subject to the foia “offends the separation of powers by compromising the” necessity “of confidentiality which allows presidential advisers to provide” frank and objectives “advice and communications.”
Boyfriend. They don’t ask that Musk coughs his private texts from Trump. They ask you to provide factual support for your assertion on the operation of DOGE.
In addition, you may have forgotten that the group of your boyfriend Stephen Miller America First is currently heading for a pleading for a vast expansion of Foia with regard to the judiciary. We will have to wait and see what the highest courtyard in the country thinks of this gambit, but let’s face it: we know that Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas will be on board with everything Trump wants.
Trump’s Criminat Crypto is fully effect
What is the current price of Dinner with the president? Well, it’s variable based on the price of his stupid piece of crypto meme, but here is how he breaks down: 220 people, many of whom are anonymous, bought $ 394 million Arcmal cryptographic coins mainly belonging to two private companies affiliated to Trump. Individual expenses varied from S55,000 to 37.7 million dollars, reaching an average of around 1.7 million dollars per head.
Federal contributions per person per person are capped at $ 3,500, but everyone knows that only fools and toddlers care. A knowledgeable people know that this decision is just to directly unite the president by investing in any scam he has.
I never thought that we would succeed in the discreet days of everyone welding Trump by spending a few thousand dollars in his DC hotel. Things were so innocent.
Ed Martin continues to be a much better intimidator than a lawyer
Last week, we learned that even this batch of Senate republicans has a kind of limits, so Ed Martin has not become the United States prosecutor for Washington, DC, he became in place to be Pardon lawyerA job that he proves to understand exactly as well as he did that of the American interim lawyer – which means, not at all.
Last week, Martin explained that the work of a Pardon lawyer was to review the pard of President Joe Biden to see if they could be canceled, which is not something that can be done. This week, he may or may not be the lawyer for forgiveness, but he too has a new concert: “Captain” of the “Army” group of the DoJ. In fashion typical Martin, he seems to have understood that it meant that he was supposed to actively arm the doj. So his new goal will be essentially to harm people even if he does not have enough prosecution.
Related | Why can’t Trump leave Ed Martin
“If they can be charged, we will charge them. But if they cannot be charged, we will name them,” he said. “And we will name them, and in a culture that respects shame, it should be people who are ashamed.”
His explanation? “This is how things work.”
Some notes, ed. First, it is “who is ashamed”. Then, is it really the prosecutor of the prosecutor Pardons? This must be under the role of armament captain, perhaps. Finally, it is literally not how things work. A little literally the opposite. You have just announced that you are using your prosecutor work (who is actually for forgiveness?) To harass people when you have no evidence to instill them.
We know that Martin’s previous legal experience has been slim, but come on, guy. These are basic things.
Campaign action
