Bold call or shocking selection?

The BCCI announced a 15-member Indian squad for the 2026 T20 World Cup, making two shocking calls: dropping Shubman Gill and Jitesh Sharma.
During his 30-month tenure as chairman of the selection committee, Ajit Agarkar responded to some big and bold calls. He oversaw the transition of the Test team from Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma to the appointment of Shubman Gill as ODI captain. We can’t say he didn’t make courageous calls. On Saturday, he did another. He left T20I vice-captain Shubman Gill out of India’s T20 World Cup squad with just five matches remaining in the tournament. He even dropped Jitesh Sharma, supporting the in-form Ishan Kishan, thus ending his two-year exile.
Although India’s squad for the 2026 T20 World Cup looks excellent, one can’t help but question some of the decisions.
- Did Agarkar give in to the team’s demand?
- Why did Agarkar make the mistake of forcing Gill into the T20I side?
- Why announce Gill as vice-captain and then let him down?
- Why play with Sanju Samson?
- What wrong did Jitesh Sharma do?
- Why didn’t Rinku Singh do the IND vs SA series?
- Ishan Kishan’s question
Indian squad for T20 World Cup 2026
| Suryakumar Yadav (c), Abhishek Sharma, Ishan Kishan (wk), Tilak Varma, Hardik Pandya, Shivam Dube, Sanju Samson (wk), Jasprit Bumrah, Varun Chakaravarthy, Arshdeep Singh, Kuldeep Yadav, Harshit Rana, Washington Sundar, Axar Patel (vc), Rinku Singh. |
Did Agarkar give in to the team’s demand?
During the post-match presentation of the IND vs SA 5th T20I in Ahmedabad, Suryakumar Yadav said something which hinted that Shubman Gill does not fit into the current T20I squad. With Gill nursing a foot injury, Sanju Samson returned and gave India a good start along with Abhishek Sharma. Samson scored 22 balls 37 with a strike rate of 168.18.
“Right from the start of the series, we wanted to stick to a particular brand of cricket and that’s exactly what we did. We didn’t try to do anything different. We wanted to express ourselves in all departments and the results are there, in front of everyone. That’s something we lacked in our last series. That’s exactly how we wanted to bat. Once someone gets going, they don’t stop. We wanted that relentless intent, and today, It worked wonderfully.” » said Suryakumar Yadav.
While Gill struggled to give India those good starts, the onus fell on Tilak Varma, especially with Suryakumar himself out of form. Since Gill’s sudden return to the T20I side for the 2025 Asia Cup, Samson has had to negotiate a place in the middle order. And he didn’t succeed. In his place, Jitesh Sharma was recruited. However, by dropping Shubman Gill, Ajit Agarkar chose to course correct 49 days before the T20 World Cup.
On social media, there have been endless debates about how Gill didn’t fit in with the team. Former Indian batter Robin Uthappa argued that Gill should play Virat Kohli’s role. Yet in the end, none of that mattered. Agarkar, who once forced Gill to join the settled side in T20Is, backed down and bowed to pressure from captain Suryakumar Yadav. Samson returned to his place. It must be noted that Gautam Gambhir has never spoken for or against either in the media, as is expected of a coach.
Why force Gill into the T20I side?
Ahead of the 2025 Asia Cup, Agarkar was optimistic when he announced Gill as vice-captain. It looked like Gill had sacrificed his place for Samson and for the Asia Cup, and he deservedly returned. To make him immune, Gill was also made vice-captain. But there were reasons. Gill exceeded all expectations in England, smashing over 700 runs in five Tests as India almost won the series. It was the man in dream form.
Three months later, that confidence has evaporated. Gill finished 2025 without a half-century, with an average of 24.25 and a strike rate of 137.26. In his final innings at Dharamshala, Gill scored 28 off 28 balls. What was supposed to be Gill’s all-format era ended in disappointment for many, including his fans.
However, more than Gill, it was the failure of the decision-makers. India’s fascination with forcing a player to play all formats has claimed another victim. As Gill changed shape and took on more responsibility, he relented. First he lost his physical form, then his form. Gill did not fit into the T20I side. He couldn’t follow the template set by Abhishek Sharma. But he was forced to join this team not only as a player but also as a vice-captain.
“We’re looking for continuity; we want a keeper who hits at the top. We know what a quality player Shubman is, even though he hasn’t found runs recently. It’s the combination more than anything else. Some people are going to miss a particular format because they’re playing in another. Let’s not make a big deal of it. Over the last few years, Gill has been the No. 1 hitter in the world. He knows what he needs to do, he knows what’s needed and, hopefully, by “Once the World Championships arrive, he will become No. 1 again,” Agarkar said on Saturday.
Why play with Sanju Samson?
With Gautam Gambhir becoming head coach, Samson has been given a new lease of life. In the 2024 T20 World Cup, Samson did not play a single match. But Gambhir supported him. He got his preferred opening slot and despite some inconsistencies, he also showed glimpses of what he could do.
Samson finished 2024 with three centuries, including two in South Africa. Even though he didn’t start 2025 well, that big move was imminent as he continued to play high-risk, high-reward shots. Then came Shubman Gill and suddenly the team management had no plan.
In some matches, Samson played as a flyhalf, as a No.3, as a No.5 and he was also stuck on the bench at No.8. Then he was dropped for Jitesh Sharma as the combinations demanded it. It was obvious that Samson had no place as a middle-order hitter, even if he tried his best. There were no concrete plans. As a result, Samson is now back as an opener in the World T20 Championship. If that was the plan all along, why make him jostle in different places, taking away his confidence?
Jitesh Sharma: Unwanted Man
Going the Shubman Gill route, Team India had to adapt. They needed a No.7 keeper-batsman in case Sanju Samson failed in the middle-order role. Finally, we came to this situation. Samson ended 2025 with just a half-century, against Oman in a slow knock, at No.3. At No. 5, he played three innings, scoring 13, 39 and 24. In some matches, he failed to even hit. Against Bangladesh, the team management showed no confidence in him to bat in the middle order as he was frozen on the bench.
Meanwhile, Jitesh Sharma has emerged as a realistic option to fit in with Gill as the opener. Jitesh could play the role of finisher, score some quick runs. He started well, scoring 22 from 13 against Australia and then 27 from 17 against South Africa in Mullanpur. But on Saturday, he was left out of the squad for the T20 World Cup. With Gill leaving the team and Samson returning to the top spot, Jitesh was suddenly an unwanted man.
Jitesh did not fail and did not make any mistake. He became another victim of the BCCI selection committee’s poor planning, just like Rinku Singh.
Rinku Singh: Inside, outside and inside
Rinku was not even in the squad for the 2024 T20 World Cup despite playing well. He had limited impact after returning to the team after the 2024 T20 WC. But more often than not, he was seen as an overachiever. He played only two deliveries in the Asia Cup with Hardik Pandya missing due to injury. Rinku was also not part of the South African series. Now he is part of the T20 WC team. If Rinku was still in the plans, why not include her in the IND vs SA series?
Not to mention Rinku, it never seemed like the selection committee or team management had any clarity on the UP hitter. Gambhir’s obsession with all-rounders made Rinku a makeshift injury replacement option.
Ishan Kishan’s question
After two years, Ishan Kishan is back in the Indian team. He will be Sanju Samson’s replacement in case of injury or if he is not fit. But to play the role of substitute according to the Gambhir model, he will only have five matches. And there’s no guarantee he’ll play every game.
For his part, the preparations have been good. He just led Jharkhand to the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy title, finishing with a century in the final. Ishan scored 517 runs in 10 innings at a thunderous strike rate of 197.32. He was also two centuries old and as many as fifty. He will be the first-rate replacement for Samson.
But why recall someone just five matches before the T20 World Cup? With so many top-notch options, wouldn’t Jitesh Sharma be the right choice? Ishan is the only player in the team who has not played a single match for India in this T20 World Cup cycle. This is another strange call.
Editor’s Choice
Cricket India T20 World Cup squad: Bold calls or selection shocks?
Featured


