Wi vs aus: the Antilles coach Daren Sammy faces the ICC action after quoting the third referee in Controversy Row
Head coach of the West Indies Daren Sammy Faced with disciplinary measures of the International Cricket Council (ICC), receiving a fine and a demerit point after having openly criticized the decision of the third arbitrator during First test against Australia in BridgetownBarbados. The incident, which took place during the game 2 game, saw the former Captain of the Antilles expressing important concerns concerning a series of controversial decisions that were still against his team.
The candid remarks of Sammy to journalists highlighted his frustration with what he perceived as inconsistent arbitration standards, specifically targeting the television referee Adrian Holdstock. He wondered publicly if the official had bias against the Antilles team, a feeling born from a series of controversial decisions throughout the match. His comments quickly attracted attention, leading to an immediate ICC investigation.
Consequently direct of his actions, the charismatic coach received a penalty of 15% of his match fees. In addition to the monetary penalty, Sammy has also engaged a point of demerit on his disciplinary file. This measure underlines the strict position of the ICC on the maintenance of the integrity of the officials of the match and the maintenance of the code of conduct.
Daren Sammy violated the Code of Conduct of the ICC
The ICC confirmed that Sammy was found in violation of article 2.7 of the CPI code of conduct. This particular article concerns “Critics of the public or inappropriate comments concerning an incident that occurred in an international match or any other player, the players’ support staff, the civil servant or the team participating in any international match.” The decision emphasizes the responsibility of individuals in management positions in the cricket to abstain from public comments which could undermine the authority or impartiality of civil servants.
Sammy’s explosion was triggered by a television referee’s decisions model, which included at least five highly questionable decisions during the first two days of the test. These controversial calls undoubtedly had a material impact on the flow of the game, potentially influencing the result against the home team.
Although the frustration of coaches and players is understandable, the ICC remains firm on its policy aimed at protecting the sacred nature of arbitration and the world image of sport. The Antilles team will now continue the series with their coach bearing a demerit point, a factor that could lead to more serious sanctions if other violations occur in the future.
Read also: Wi vs aus – Daren Sammy is unleashed with controversial calls from Holdstock referee during the Ten -tinted test
The justification of Sammy: questions to the consistency of the referee
Addressing the media after the game of the day, Sammy articulated the desire of the greatest coherence team in the stop. “You don’t want to put yourself in a situation where you are wondering about certain referees. Is there anything against this team? ” Sammy said, not moving away from his concerns. The 41 -year -old man has developed, “But when you see a decision after the decision, it raises the question. I know it is here for the series. You don’t want to go to a test match with this doubt.”
The coach also revealed that his apprehension concerning the Holdstock Commission was not new, suggesting a perceived diagram which dates back to the Antilles series against England. According to Sammy, this story has fueled its public interrogation of decisions and consistency of the referee.
Read also: Roston Chase is unleashed with arbitration standards after the overwhelming defeat of the Antilles against Australia during the first test
