How to reform the calendar of costs of Medicare doctors to redefine primary care

ahsan65@gmail.comSeptember 17, 2025

0 0 6 minutes read

How to reform the calendar of costs of Medicare doctors to redefine primary care

This audio is generated automatically. Please let us know if you have comments.

Primary care physicians are often called quarter of health care because they coordinate and direct patient travel via the medical system. In a typical NFL team, the quarter is the best paid player.

But in health care, it could not be further away from the truth. Primary care physicians gain considerably less than many of their colleagues in other areas, a differential that has led to shortages in the doctor and problems with patients.

Part of the problem lies in the payment system of Medicare doctors, experts said during a panel of the Bipartisan Policy Center on Wednesday.

The reimbursement of doctors in the massive federal insurance program is built on a collection of codes and services that do not encourage American doctors to improve the health of their patients, according to speakers. And as private insurers generally follow the example of a medication when it comes to setting payment rates, this has contributed to systemic underinvestment in primary care.

On average, rich countries run around 13% of their health expenses to primary care. But the United States spends less than 5%.

“The future of primary care is in danger with decreasing access and rifle. Evidence and experts highlight a deep cause of this crisis – the broken payment system. We do not pay effectively, and we do not invest sufficiently in primary care, “said Corinne Lewis, assistant vice-president of the reform of the delivery system to the Commonwealth Fund.

A solution is to expand value -based payment agreements, which reward suppliers to improve the results for patients instead of the quantity of services provided.

The health system is evolving in this direction, although a snail rate: in 2023, more than 45% of all American health payments have traveled alternative payment models or in payment agreements based on the population, according to the learning and action network on the payment of health care. This increases compared to around 34% in 2018.

Growth is partly thanks to the CMS, which has introduced a number of value -based care models, including some directly targeted on primary care, in the midst of the doctors’ enthusiasm about arrangements.

However, a 2022 survey revealed that 46% of primary care physicians said they received value -based payments. Financial obstacles and the burden of documentation put the change out of reach for many. But the signals according to which the Congress and the Trump administration are interested in redefining primary care and the health of the population have experts who hope for the reform.

“We have a reflexive cynicism that nothing can change, we have already seen it and we must accept our costly mediocre results. And I would say that the change begins by rejecting this comfortable and cynical position,” said Dr. Asaf Bitton, the executive director of the BRMIG and BPC event.

“We have proof that is that the reference remuneration simply does not work for large bands of our patient population,” added Bitton. “We know what we have to do next, and it is then a question of will.”

Achoppement blocks for value -based primary care

Nearly 70 million Americans receive health insurance through Medicare, which pays for the services of doctors and other ambulatory care as part of its Part B program. The program assigns prices for thousands of health services depending on the work that doctors put in it and the expenses that the practices take. The CMS updates the prices for the following year each fall.

Doctors have a lot of reproaches with this configuration. On the one hand, regulators are required to maintain changes to the budget for the prices of neutral doctors, therefore the increases in one area must be equaled by cuts in another.

Consequently, the annual increases in the levels for doctors are nominal and are lagging behind in relation to inflation – and as specialized services as surgeries generally receive a higher reimbursement, the requirement has thwarted hiking payments for primary care.

Budgetary neutrality “is something with which we have been struggling for a very long time,” said Stephanie Quinn, main vice-president of external affairs and experience of practice at the American Academy of Family Physicians, during the BPC panel.

The congress generally intervenes and increases the health insurance rates each year to bypass the problem of budgetary neutrality. The “Big Beautiful Bill” adopted in July included an increase in basic wages of 2.5% for doctors next year. But to wait for it from the congress to allocate increases is stressful and, at best, gives a temporary solution, according to doctors, who say that unpredictable payment makes it difficult for them to hire staff, make long -term investments or consider alternative payment agreements.

“Without this predictability or this stability, you cannot break the resources to be able to take care of a population,” said Quinn.

Another problem is Medicare’s dependence on a unit of relative work value units, which measure the effort, the resources and the time that enter a service. According to Bitton, work RVUs are necessary for the adjustment of health insurance rates, but do not take into account the value or usefulness of a specific service, according to Bitton.

Metrics are also created by an American Medical Association Committee based on the doctor’s survey data, which creates an inherent conflict of interest and can inflate the payment of specialized services, according to criticism. The CMS is not required to accept the committee’s recommendations, but generally.

“What is not in the way we define work in the Medicare costs calendar is that it is not based on the need for service, the quality of services, the results for the health of the service or the cost of the service to the company or to our patients,” said Bitton.

PAPET for primary care

The challenge with primary care is that it is not measured in discreet units, it is therefore difficult to attribute value with precision, in particular in a system largely at service costs such as traditional health insurance. But value -based payment models still use the cost calendar as a reference point to determine the value of a service package, so system reform will help pay the industry to pay the value, experts said during the BPC event.

“If you have a distortion in this underlying structure, you will be incredibly challenged to design a payment model that rejuvenates with precision and appropriately,” said Quinn.

Medicare should consider refining how it measures the value of services, including workplace, to restart primary care, suggested speakers. The CMS has already taken measures in this direction in the program offered for the costs for 2026, to the chagrin of specialized doctors.

Regulators could also use more data to determine the value of services beyond the AMA doctor surveys, the panelists said. The commissioning of additional data in this area is a solution supported by the powerful Senate financing committee, which published bipartite legislation last year to create other alternative payment agreements for primary care providers.

The legislation, called PAY PCPS ACT, would also force the CMS to create a technical advisory committee to supervise the precise determination of the RVU.

“This can look like a very technical problem – how to appreciate doctors’ services, and it’s a bunch of doctors by simply saying that they need more money – and it’s actually much more serious and consecutive,” said Bitton.

Legislators and regulators should also adopt large population -based payment models and run over a longer period. This will give doctors more financial and confidence to invest in the infrastructure underlying value-based care, said Dr. Barry Arbuckle, president and chief executive officer of Southern California System Memorialcare.

The increase in data exchange between the various health care organizations would also offer providers of care management for a patient population a clearer vision of their needs, regardless of the place of provision of services.

Likewise, the standardization of quality measures in value -based models would considerably reduce obstacles to entering alternative payment models, said Arbuckle. Currently, Federal and private payers use a variety of measures to follow performance, creating administrative headaches for suppliers who scare a lot to participate in value -based arrangements, according to the CEO.

“For a primary care doctor or an organization of suppliers to try to determine, what a depression measurement I use to measure for this patient and what time did I use to look at the remission – 30 days, 90 days, 120 days – it’s a breathtaking. Said Arbuckle. “This is not what we want. We must therefore harmonize measures and measures as much as possible. ”